Investigative modes in research on data use in education

References

• References marked with an asterisk (*) are studies included in the review. Only those publications that have been referenced in this article are included in the reference list.
   Google Scholar
• Aasen, P., & Prøitz, T. (2003). Sektorsmyndigheternas roll i svensk skolforskning. Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, 8(4), 255.
   Google Scholar
• Aasen, P., & Prøitz, T. S. (2004). Initiering, finansiering och förvaltning av praxisnära forskning. In NIFU report, 10, 2004. Oslo: NIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Aasen, P., Prøitz, T. S., & Borgen, J. S. (2005) Utdanningsvitenskap som forskningsområde: En studie av Vetenskapsrådets støtte til utdanningsvitenskaplig forskning. Stockholm, Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Ackeren, I. V. (2002). Zentrale Tests und Prüfungen im Dienste schulischer Entwicklung. Bildung und Erziehung, 55(1), 59–86. * 10.7788/bue.2002.55.1.59
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., & Merki, K. M. (2010). Handbuch neue steuerung im schulsystem (pp. 15–37). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. * 10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Beywl, W. (2013). Mit Taten zu Daten. Der Ansatz der unterrichtsintegrierten Selbstevaluation. Journal für Schulentwicklung–Themenheft: Mit Daten zu Taten–Wenn Schulen Wissen nutzen, 17(1), 7–14. *
   Google Scholar
• Bjerre, J. (2009). Fagsprogets frasigelse. En kritisk diskussion af læreres konstruktion af evidens, evaluering og teori. Nordisk Pedagogik, 3, 250–258. *
   Google Scholar
• Bonsen, M., & Frey, K. A. (2013). Schulentwicklungsforschung zur Nutzung von Leistungstests. Journal für Schulentwicklung, 17 (1), 38–45. *
   Google Scholar
• Bos, W., & Schwippert, K. (2002). TIMSS, PISA, IGLU & Co. Vom Sinn und Unsinn internationaler Schulleistungsuntersuchungen. Bildung und Erziehung, 55(1), 5–24. * 10.7788/bue.2002.55.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher, W., & Keune, M. S. (2013). Schulinspektion und Schulentwicklung. Journal für Schulentwicklung, 2(13). *
   Google Scholar
• Breiter, A., & Stauke, E. (2007). Anforderungen an elektronische Rückmeldesysteme aus Nutzersicht. Empirische Pädagogik, 21(4), 383–400. *
   Google Scholar
• Büchter, A., & Leuders, T. (2005). From students’ achievement to the development of teaching: Requirements for feedback in comparative tests. ZDM, 37(4), 324–334. *
   Google Scholar
• Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. (2012). Teaching for statistical literacy: Utilising affordances in real-world data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 339–362. * 10.1007/s10763-011-9303-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Educational Change, 9(4), 173–206. *
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., Goh, S. C., & Clark, S. (2006). Data use leads to data valuing: Evaluative inquiry for school decision making. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 155–176. * 10.1080/15700760500365468
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2012). High school teachers’ use of data to inform instruction. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17(4), 247–265. * 10.1080/10824669.2012.718944
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3–4), 366–378. 10.1080/713688543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedrich, M., & Pietsch, M. (2013) Wie unterstützt eine Schulinspektion die Entwicklung schulischer. Journal für Schulentwicklung, 1(13).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data driven decision-making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 87–98. * 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, J., II, & Tulowitzki, P. (Eds.). (2016). Educational accountability: International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fasting, R. (2006). Kan skriveferdigheter måles? Nordisk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 5(6), 372–381. *
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., & Wallin, E. (2005). Skolverkets program för resultatförbättring i grundskolan: Ett kontraproduktivt förslag? Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, 10(3–4), 300–309. *
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B. (2008). Liberal learning in centralising states. In B. Fuller, M. K. Henne, & E. Hannum (Eds.), Strong states, weak schools: The benefits and dilemmas of centralised accountability. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, H. (2013). Praxis und Verhältnis interner und externer Evaluation im Schulsystem im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 16(4), 693–712. * 10.1007/s11618-013-0444-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2001). Using pupil performance data for judging schools and teachers: Scope and limitations. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 433–442. * 10.1080/01411920120071443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2013). An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Tripney, J., Kenny, C., & Buk-Berge, E. (2011). Evidence informed policy in education in Europe: EIPEE final project report. London: EPPI-Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 417–430. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, H., Hall, D., Serpieri, R., & Grimaldi, E. (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. London. Routledge, 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., Grimaldi, E., Gunter, H. M., Møller, J., Serpieri, R., & Skedsmo, G. (2015). Educational reform and modernisation in Europe: The role of national contexts in mediating the new public management. European Educational Research Journal, 14(6), 487–507. 10.1177/1474904115615357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerstrøm, K., Wade, A., & Jørgensen, A. (2010). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews 2010: Supplement 1. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, T. (2013). Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability. Responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Haugstveit, T. B. (2005). Vurdering som profesjonsfaglig kompetanse–Læreres refleksjoner over egen vurderingspraksis på 5., 6. og 7. trinn. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 6, 417–430. *
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. M. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377–386. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2015). ‘Didaktik meets Curriculum’ revisited: Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456. 10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornskov, S., Bjerg, H., & Høvsgaard, L. (2015). Review: Brug af data i skoleledelse. København: UCC.
   Google Scholar
• Husfeldt, V. (2004). Large-scale assessments. Ihr möglicher Beitrag zur Qualitäts entwicklung von Schulen und Unterricht. Die Deutsche Schule, 96, 4. *
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, K., Halt, A. C., Hosenfeld, I., Helmke, A., & Groß Ophoff, J. (2006). VERA: Qualitätsentwicklung und Lehrerprofessionalisierung durch Vergleichsarbeiten. Die Deutsche Schule, 98(1), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A., & Thornberg, P. (2015). Samsyn eller samstämmighet? En diskussion om sambedömning som redskap för likvärdig bedömning i skolan. Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, 19(4–5),386–402. *
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103–120. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., & Downey, C. (2011). Professional attitudes to the use of pupil performance data in English secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(4), 415–437. * 10.1080/09243453.2011.600525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. * 10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65–79. * 10.1080/0969594X.2011.592972
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., & Stanat, P. (2002). Zur Aussagekraft internationaler Schulleistungsvergleiche-Befunde und Erklärungsansätze am Beispiel von PISA. Bildung und Erziehung, 55(1), 25–44. * 10.7788/bue.2002.55.1.25
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, I. M., & Prøitz, T. S. (2005. Satsingen Strategiske høgskoleprosjekter–en underveisevaluering. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.
   Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education–a research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. 10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practices among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166. * 10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hulten, M., & Tveit, S. (2017) The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. forthcoming this issue 1–11 10.1080/20020317.2017.1317229
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., & Tveit, S. (2015). Att legitimera nationella prov i Sverige och Norge-En fråga om profession och tradition. Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, 19(4–5), 297–323. *
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., & Lidar, M. (2013). Nationella prov i NO och lärares val av undervisningsinnehåll. Utbildning & Demokrati, 22(3), 85–106. *
   Google Scholar
• Lunneblad, J., & Carlsson, M. A. (2010). En prövningens tid. Om det nationella provet i svenska i Skolår 5. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 15(2–3), 81–96. *
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U.P. (2006). Political governing and curriculum change: From active to reactive curriculum reforms. The need fora reorientation of curriculum theory. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, U. (2008). Rezeption und Nutzung von Vergleichsarbeiten aus der Perspektive von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift fã¼r p㤠dagogik, 54(1), 95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Smeby, J. C. (2016). Contemporary education policy and teacher professionalism. In M. Dent, I. V. Bourgeault, J.-L. Denis, & E. Kuhlmann (Eds.). The Routledge companion to the professions and professionalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. L. (2010). Accountability policy implementation and the case of smaller school district capacity: Three contrasting cases that examine the flow and use of NCLB accountability data. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(4), 384–420. * 10.1080/15700760903342350
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Norway: Centralisation and decentralisation as twin reform strategies. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership (pp. 61–72). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344. 10.1177/1474904116639311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, L. (2006). Fra politiske demokratidiskurser mod markedsorienterede effektivitetsdiskurser [From political discourses of democracy towards market oriented efficiency discourses]. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26(4), 322–332.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, U. (2013). Was wirkt in der Schule–und was nicht. Journal für Schulentwicklung, 1(13). *
   Google Scholar
• Murnane, R. J., Sharkey, N. S., & Boudett, K. P. (2005). Using student-assessment results to improve instruction: Lessons from a workshop. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 269–280. * 10.1207/s15327671espr1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, C., & Hellrung, H. (2013). Zur zeitlichen Entwicklung der Rezeption von Vergleichsarbeiten, Empirische Pädagogik, 27(4), 423–441. *
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Atlanta, GA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. V., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Lillejord, S. (2013). Elevenes læringssituasjon etter Kunnskapsløftet. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 97(6), 355–369. *
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self‐evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. 10.1080/02680930902733121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. (2011). Managing student learning schools as multipliers of intangible resources. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 733–750. * 10.1177/1741143211416385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, V., Daly, A. J., & Guerra, A. W. (2013). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy, 27(4), 645–675. * 10.1177/0895904811429295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M, & Timperley, H. S. (2008). Teachers, schools and using evidence: Considerations of preparedness. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, D., Prøitz, T., & Forsberg, E. (2017). From role models to nations in need of advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD’s magnifying glass. Journal of Education Policy, 1–24. 10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S. (2010). Learning outcomes: What are they? Who defines them? When and Where are they defined?. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(2), 119-137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., & Aasen, P. (2017) Making and re-making the Nordic model of education. In A. Wivel & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), Routledge handbook on Scandinavian politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rieper, O., & Hansen, H. F. (2007). Metodedebatten om evidens. København: AKF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Phillips, G., & Timperley, H. (2002). Using achievement data for school-based curriculum review: A bridge too far? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(1), 3–29. * 10.1076/lpos.1.1.3.5402
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2014). Reformideer og deres tornefulle vei inn i skolefeltet. In K. A. Røvik, T. V. Eilertsen, & E. M. Furu (Eds.), Reformideer i norsk skole. Spredning, oversettelse og implementering. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496. * 10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schratz, M. (2013). (Wie) Wird aus Forschung Schulentwicklung? Journal für Schulentwicklung, 2(13). *
   Google Scholar
• Skaftun, A., Solheim, O., Roe, A., & Narvhus, E. K. (2006). Tilnærminger til et teoretisk rammeverk for de nasjonale prøvene i lesing. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 90(5), 360–371. *
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Przybylski, R., & Johnson, B. J. (2016). A review of research on teachers’ use of student data: From the perspective of school leadership. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1),5–33. 10.1007/s11092-016-9238-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. (2012). Getting at student understanding – The key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), n11. *
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Pring, R. (2004). Evidence-based practice in education. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ackeren, I. (2002). Zentrale Tests und Prüfungen im Dienste schulischer Entwicklung. Bildung und Erziehung, 55(1), 59–86. *
   Google Scholar
• Van Weeren, J. (2007). Wem nutzen Outputmessungen? Eine kritische Analyse ihrer Wirksamkeit und Nebeneffekte aus niederländischer Perspektive. Die Deutsche Schule, 99(2), 210–223. *
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., Verhaeghe, G., Verhaeghe, J. P., Valcke, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). The influence of competences and support on school performance feedback use. Educational Studies, 37(2), 141–154. * 10.1080/03055698.2010.482771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker, A., & Kramer, J. (2012). Vergleichsarbeiten in Baden-Württemberg. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 1–24. *
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Jimerson, J. B., & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 159–178. * 10.1080/09243453.2011.652124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedin, Å. (2010). Bedöma eller döma?: Språkbedömning och lästest i grundskolans tidigare år. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 15(2–3), 219–231. *
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. J. (2014). Introductory: Coding. Presentation held at the Campbell Collaboration Colloquium training workshops 2014 in Belfast, Ireland
   Google Scholar
• Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 521–548. * 10.1086/505058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Archivos Analíticos De Políticas Educativas = Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19), 1. *
   PubMedGoogle Scholar