The status of aesthetic education in a revised centralized curriculum: a theory-based and content-oriented evaluation of the Swedish curriculum reform Gy11

References

• Apple, M. W. (2003). Competition, knowledge, and the loss of educational vision. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 11, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Aróstegui, J. L. (2016). Exploring the global decline of music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(2), 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, A. (2012). Arts and cultural education in Norway 2010/2011. Bodø: Norwegian Centre for Arts and Cultural Education (KKS).
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control, Vol. III: Towards a theory of educational transmission. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A., McGimpsey, I., & Santori, D. (2013). Revising rationality: The use of ‘Nudge’ approaches in neoliberal education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 247–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 723–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In M. F. Conelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 66–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., Hallsworth, D., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2010). Mindspace: Influencing behavior through public policy. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program theory-driven evaluation science. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. (2009). Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union.(2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competencies for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 49, L 394, 30 December 2016 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European co-operation in education and training (‘ET 2020ʹ). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E. (2008). Framtidsvägen – En huvudled eller en skiljeväg? [Path to the future – A highway or a crossroad?]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 17, 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Franke-Wikberg, S. (1992). Teoriinriktad utvärdering – Ett fruktbart alternativ för en pedagogisk utvärderare? [Theory-based evaluation – A fruitful option for an educational evaluator?]. In S. Selander (Ed.), Forskning om utbildning: En antologi (pp. 194–205). Stockholm: Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.
   Google Scholar
• Franke-Wikberg, S., & Lundgren, U. P. (1979). Att värdera utbildning, Del 1: En introduktion till pedagogisk utvärdering [Valuing Education, Vol. 1: An introduction to educational evaluation]. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S., Lawn, M., Lingard, B., Ozga, J., Rinne, R., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (2009). National policy brokering and the construction of the European Education Space in England, Sweden, Finland and Scotland. Comparative Education, 45(1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 459–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, A., & Maton, K. (2008). Choosing music: Exploratory studies into the low uptake of music GCSE. British Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J. (2013). Musik i (ut)bildning: Gränsdragningar och inramningar i läroplans(kon)texter för gymnasieskolan [Music in education: Curricular boundaries and frames in upper secondary education]. Diss: Örebro universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J. (2015). The recontextualisation of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(1), 27008.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J., Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2016). Teoribaserad utvärdering som svar på det tidiga 2000-talets frågor om utbildningsreformer [Theory-based evaluation in response to the issues of education reforms in the early 2000s]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 21, 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lindensjö, B., & Lundgren, U. P. (2000). Utbildningsreformer och politisk styrning [Educational reforms and political governance]. Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2011). Swedish upper secondary education: Policy and organizational context. In E. Öhrn, L. Lundahl, & D. Beach (Eds.), Young people’s influence and democratic education: Ethnographic studies in upper secondary schools (pp. 13–28). London: Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (2015). What’s in a name? That which we call a crisis? A commentary on Michael Young’s article ‘Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 787–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2016). Travelling concepts in national curriculum policy-making: The example of competencies. European Educational Research Journal, 15, 314–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, M., & Rosvall, P.-Å. (2016). A curriculum tailored for workers? Knowledge organization and possible transitions in Swedish VET. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 692–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, M., Rosvall, P.-Å., & Ledman, K. (2017). The vocational-academic divide in neoliberal upper secondary curricula: The Swedish case. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 788–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oftedal Telhaug, A., Asbjørn Mediås, O., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. (2008/09:199). Högre krav och kvalitet i den nya gymnasieskolan [Higher requirements and quality in the new upper secondary school]. Regeringsproposition [Government Bill]. Stockholm: Regeringen.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010:2039). Gymnasieförordning [The upper secondary school ordinance]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Skollagen (2010:800) [Education Act (2010:800)]. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2008:27). Framtidsvägen – En reformerad gymnasieskola [Path to the future – A reformed upper secondary school], Betänkande av Gymnasieutredningen [Report of the Upper Secondary School Committee of Inquiry]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standard-based curricula in a denationalized conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Upper secondary school 2011. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2013). Curriculum for the upper secondary school. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2003). Models of evaluation. In P. Haug & T. A. Schwandt (Eds.), Evaluating educational reforms: Scandinavian perspectives (pp. 41–71). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (2016). A third wave of European education policy: Transnational and national conceptions of knowledge in Swedish curricula. European Educational Research Journal, 15, 298–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, N. (2015). Theory-based evaluation of the curriculum Lgr 11. Working Paper 2015: 11. Uppsala: IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 41–75.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (1970). Curriculum evaluation. Review of Educational Research, 40, 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2002). The overt and hidden curricula of quasi-markets. In G. Whitty (Ed.), Making sense of education policy (pp. 94–106). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar