Revisiting ‘curriculum crisis’ dialogue: in search of an antidote

References

• Adler, M. J. (1951). Labor, leisure, and liberal education. The Journal of General Education, 6(1), 35–45.
   Google Scholar

• Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, T. (2006). Subjectivity, schooling, society: Between and beyond German Didaktik and Anglo-American curriculum studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society: The educational transformation of culture. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P. (2015). A note on knowledge in the schooled society: Towards an end to the crisis in curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 763–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J. H., & Spade, J. Z. (2007). Understanding education through sociological theory. Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. Power and Ideology in Education, 487–511.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1971). Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 36, 1002–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F., & Xu, S. (2008). The landscape of curriculum and instruction: Diversity and continuity. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 514–533). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Counts, G. (1932). Dare the school build a new social order (pp. 9–10). New York: John Day Co.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 66–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015a). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 723–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015b). Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 773–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018). Bringing knowledge back in: Perspectives from liberal education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (1974). Conflicting concepts of curriculum. Berkeley: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. K. (2004). Exemplars of curriculum theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B. B., & Hopmann, S. (1998). Didaktik and/or curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H. (1966). Educational theory. In J. W. Tibble (Ed.), The study of education (pp. 29–58). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, U. (2015). Michael Young and the curriculum field in South Africa. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 733–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (1995). Didaktik and/or curriculum (Vol. 147). Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., & Meyer, M. A. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond fragmentation. Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Humboldt, V. W. (1793/2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P. (1999). The Deutsche Didaktik and the American research on teaching. In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as science(-s) of the teaching profession? (pp. 21–36). Umeå, Sweden: Thematic Network of Teacher Education in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of critical-constructive Didaktik. In B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 29–46). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000a). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000b). Didaktik analysis as the core preparation of instruction. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (1970). The Tyler rationale. The School Review, 78, 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–1958. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (1998). The common frame and places of Didaktik. In B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 29–46). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lagemann, E. C. (1989). The plural worlds of educational research. History of Education Quarterly, 29(2), 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental involvement in elementary education. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J. (2015). The recontextualisation of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(1), 27008.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (2015). What’s in a name? That which we call a crisis? A commentary on Michael Young’s article ‘Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 787–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüth, C. (1998). On Wilhelm von Humboldt’s theory of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1971). Capital: 3 Vol. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• McEneaney, E. H. (2015). Finding knowledge on the internet: Implications for the knowledge-driven curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 802–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, R. A., & Torres, C. A. (1995). Social theory and education: A critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (Vol. 17). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk, B. (1996). Bildung. In D. Lenzen (Ed.), Pädagogische Grundbegriffe. Band 1 (pp. 208–221). Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Seel, H. (1999). “Allgemeine Didaktik” (“General Didactics”) and “Fachdidaktik” (“Subject Didactics”). In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as science(-s) of the teaching profession? (pp. 13–20). Umeå, Sweden: Thematic Network of Teacher Education in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Siljander, P., & Sutinen, A. (2012). Introduction. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tahirsylaj, A. (2017). Curriculum field in the making: Influences that led to social efficiency as dominant curriculum ideology in progressive era in the US. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(1), 618–628.
   Google Scholar
• Tahirsylaj, A. (2019). Teacher autonomy and responsibility variation and association with student performance in Didaktik and curriculum traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 162–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahirsylaj, A., Niebert, K., & Duschl, R. (2015). Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st century: Still divergent or converging? European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 262–281.
   Google Scholar
• Tibble, J. W. (1966). Introduction. In J. W. Tibble (Ed.), The study of education (pp. vii–x). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1961). Ethnic groups. Theories of Society, 1, 305–309.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2008). A social realist alternative for curriculum. Critical Studies in Education, 49(2), 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2015). Not just skills: What a focus on knowledge means for vocational education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 750–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Traditions of practice in US preservice teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar