Is PISA more important to school reforms than educational research? The selective use of authoritative references in media and in parliamentary debates

References

• Andersen, J. A. (2009). Organisasjonsteori. Fra argument og motargument til kunnskap. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2016). The education debate. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, H. (2010, December 15). Bluff om PISA. [The scam about PISA]. Dagens Nyheter. http://ret.nu/UDBylUBH
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD PISA study as a soft power in education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Papers No. 71. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 172–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edling, S., & Liljestrand, J. (2019). Let’s talk about teacher education! Analysing the media debates in 2016–2017 on teacher education using Sweden as a case. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1631255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. (2004). Education, education and indoctrination! Packaging politics and the three Rs. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000207601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.58.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2015). Situated, relational and practice-oriented. The actor-network theory approach. In K. N. Gulson, M. Clarke, & E. B. Petersen (Eds.), Education policy and contemporary theory. Implications for research (pp. 87–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härnquist, K. (1997). Educational research in Sweden: Infrastructure and Orientation. In K.-E. Rosengren & B. Öhngren (Eds.), An evaluation of Swedish research in education. HFSR,  235–272.
   Google Scholar
• Haugsbakk, G. (2013). From Sputnik to PISA shock – New technology and educational reform in Norway and Sweden. Education Inquiry, 4(4), 23222. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i4.23222
   Google Scholar
• Heller Sahlgren, G. (2015, December 30). Kunskapsskolans fall och återkomst. [The fall and return of the school of knowledge]. Dagens nyheter. http://ret.nu/6mKeZbBZ
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., & Görgen, K. (2017). The politics of PISA: The media, policy and public responses in Norway and England. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén, M. (2019). Striden om den goda skolan. Hur kunskapsfrågan enat, splittrat och förändrat svensk skola och skoldebatt. Nordic Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hultqvist, E., Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2018). Critical analyses of educational reforms in an era of transnational governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvar, M., & Lundberg, I. (2006, June 21). Läscentrum mot bättre vetande. [Centre for reading against better knowledge]. Svenska Dagbladet. http://ret.nu/u1N3Lxfe
   Google Scholar
• Kamens, D. D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 117–140). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• König, P. D. (2016). Communicating austerity measures during times of crisis: A comparative empirical analysis of four heads of government. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148115625380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S. (2011). Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment. Köpenhamns Universitet, Department of Biostatistics.
   Google Scholar
• Landahl, J., & Lundahl, C. (Eds.). (2017). Bortom PISA. Internationell och jämförande pedagogik. [Beyond PISA. International and comparative Pedagogy]. Natur och Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., Klapp, A., & Mickwitz, L. (2015). Betygens geografi – Forskning om betyg och summativa bedömningar i Sverige och internationellt. Delrapport från Skolforskprojektet. Vetenskapsrådet. Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (2017). En utbildning för alla – Skolan expanderar [Education for all – The expansion of schooling]. In U. P. Lundgren, R. Säljö, & C. Lidberg (Eds.), Skola, lärande, bildning – En grundbok för lärare (4th ed., pp. 91–114). Natur och Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. (2014). Reforming teacher education in england − ‘An economy of discourses of truth’. In M. A. Peters, B. Cowev, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 483–494). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2007). How to become an influential actor: The ‘comparative turn’ in OECD education policy. In K. Martens, A. Rusconi, & K. Lutz (Eds.), Transformations of the state and global governance (pp. 40–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martéus, A. C. (2015, April 2). Försök inte babbla bort PISA. [Don’t babble PISA away]. Expressen. http://ret.nu/qHDz7pS
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: A non-anglophone perspective. Assessment in education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417467.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, A. (2014). Crisis as a discursive legitimation strategy in educational reforms: A critical policy analysis. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.24047.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/Improving-Schools-in-Sweden.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, D., Prøitz, T., & Forsberg, E. (2017). From role models to nations in need of advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD’s magnifying glass. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizmony-Levy, O. (2017). Big comparisons, little knowledge: Public engagement with PISA in the USA and Israel. In A. Wiseman & C. Stevens Taylor (Eds.), The OECD’s impact on education worldwide (pp. 125–156). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pizmony-Levy, O., & Bjorklund, P., Jr. (2018). International assessments of student achievement and public confidence in education: Evidence from a cross-national study. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringarp, J., & Waldow, F. (2016). From ‘silent borrowing’to the international argument–legitimating Swedish educational policy from 1945 to the present day. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(1), 29583. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.29583
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education (pp. 3–52). Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J., & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 29–53). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). PISA and the expanding role of the OECD in global educational governance. In I. H. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy (pp. 185–206). Symposium Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.981198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serder, M. (2015). Möten med PISA. Kunskapsmätning som samspel mellan elever och provuppgifter i och om naturvetenskap [Encounters with PISA. Knowledge measurement as co-action between students and test assignments in and about science] [Doctoral dissertation]. Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Serder, M., & Ideland, M. (2016). PISA truth effects: The construction of low performance. Discourse: The Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1025039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen, C. A. (2004). Appropriating borrowed policies: Outcomes-based education in South Africa. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 101–113). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 4–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G., Appleton, M., & Vellan, S. (2018). Understanding business interests in international large-scale student assessments: A media analysis of the economist, financial times, and wall street journal. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1379383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.). (2012). World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, S., & Lundahl, C. (2018). New modes of policy legitimation in education: (Mis)using comparative data to effectuate assessment reform. European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117728846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2009). Undeclared imports: Silent borrowing in educational policy‐making and research in Sweden. Comparative Education, 45(4), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060903391628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2017). Projecting images of the ‘good’ and the ‘bad school’: Top scorers in educational large-scale assessments as reference societies. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(5), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1262245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (1999). Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782437
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, M. (2018). The media as apparatus in the becoming of education policy: Education media discourse during two electoral periods. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 16(2), 99–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09350472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar