223
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The importance of organizational capacities for collaborative research: boundary crossings within a Swedish research–practice partnership

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 17 Dec 2023, Accepted 13 Jun 2024, Published online: 19 Jun 2024

References

  • Ahlstrand, P., & Andersson, N. (2021). Learning study – a model for practice-based research in a Swedish theatre classroom. Youth Theatre Journal, 35(1–2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2021.1910602
  • Arreman, E. I. (2008). The process of finding a shape: Stabilising new research structures in Swedish teacher education, 2000–2007. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2008.7.2.157
  • Benerdal, M., & Westman, A.-K. (2023). Organising for collaboration with schools: Experiences from six Swedish universities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Published online. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2263476
  • Bergmark, U., & Hansson, K. (2021). How teachers and principals enact the policy of building education in Sweden on a scientific foundation and proven experience: Challenges and opportunities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(3), 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1713883
  • Christianakis, M. (2010). Collaborative research and teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(2), 109–125.
  • Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
  • Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. (2013). Research–practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. William T. Grant Foundation.
  • Coburn, C. E., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100403
  • Cochrane-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  • Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09372-5
  • Farrell, C. C., & Coburn, C. E. (2017). Absorptive capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding district central office learning. Journal of Educational Change, 18(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9291-7
  • Farrell, C. C., Coburn, C., & Chong, S. (2019). Under what conditions do school districts learn from external partners? The role of absorptive capacity. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 955–994. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218808219
  • Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). “What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?” Role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419849595
  • Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Anderson, E. R., Bohannon, A. X., Coburn, C. E., & Brown, S. L. (2022). Learning at the boundaries of research and practice: A framework for understanding research–practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211069073
  • Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C., Daniel, J., & Steup, L. (2021). Research–practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.
  • Fjørtoft, H., & Sandvik, L. V. (2021). Leveraging situated strategies in research–practice partnerships: Participatory dialogue in a Norwegian school. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101063
  • Forssten Seiser, A., & Portfelt, I. (2024). Critical aspects to consider when establishing collaboration between school leaders and researchers: Two cases from Sweden. Educational Action Research, 32(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2022.2110137
  • Furuhagen, B., Holmén, J., & Säntti, J. (2019). The ideal teacher: Orientations of teacher education in Sweden and Finland after the second world war. History of Education, 48(6), 784–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2019.1606945
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (Vol. 6). Sage.
  • Håkansson, J., & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2022). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09414-6
  • Hopkins, M., Weddle, H., Gluckman, M., & Gautsch, L. (2019). Boundary crossings in a professional association: The dynamics of research use among state leaders and researchers in a research-practice partnership. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891964
  • Jarl, M., Fredriksson, A., & Persson, P. (2012). New public management in public education: A catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals. Public Administration, 90(2), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01995.x
  • Jarl, M., Taube, M., & Björklund, C. (2024). Exploring roles in teacher–researcher collaboration: Examples from a Swedish research–practice partnership in education. Education Inquiry, ahead of print. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2024.2324518
  • Kirsten, N., & Wermke, W. (2016). Governing teachers by professional development: State programmes for continuing professional development in Sweden since 1991. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1151082
  • Lau, S. M. C., & Still, S. (2014). Participatory research with teachers: Toward a pragmatic and dynamic view of equity and parity in research relationships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.882313
  • Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2023). Recognizing LEA officials’ translator competences when implementing new policy directives for documentation of schools’ systematic quality work. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2206882
  • Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education - a research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
  • Lundahl, L. (2005). A matter of self-governance and control. The reconstruction of Swedish education policy: 1980-2003. European Education, 37(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2005.11042375
  • Magnusson, P., & Malmström, M. (2023). Practice-near school research in Sweden: Tendencies and teachers’ roles. Education Inquiry, 14(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2028440
  • Malmström, M. (2023). Anticipations of practice-near school research in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 9(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2023.2236751
  • Montin, S. (2015). Municipalities, regions, and county councils: Actors and institutions. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The oxford handbook of Swedish politics (pp. 367–382). Oxford University Press.
  • Nordholm, D., Arnqvist, A., & Nihlfors, E. (2021). Sense-making of autonomy and control. Comparing school leaders in public and independent schools in a Swedish case. Journal of Educational Change, 23(4), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09429-z
  • Nutley, S., Jung, T., & Walter, I. (2008). The many forms of research-informed practice: A framework for mapping diversity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640801889980
  • Öijen, L., Öhman-Sandberg, A., & Haglind, U. (2020). Kommunala skolhuvudmäns syn på samverkan med universitet kring praktiknära forskning. Rapport 2020:4. [Municipalities’ perceptions of collaboration with universities on practice-near research. Report 2024:4.]. Örebro University
  • Penuel, W., Allen, A.-R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research-practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
  • Penuel, W. R., Riedy, R., Barber, M. S., Peurach, D. J., LeBouef, W., & Clark, T. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
  • Popa, N. (2023). Navigating contexts to facilitate RPPs. Learning from local and international experiences. Roundtable report Unpublished. Karlstad University.
  • Prøitz, T. S., & Rye, E. (2023). Actor roles in research–practice relationships: Equality in policy–practice nexuses. In T. S. Prøitz, P. Aasen, & W. Wermke (Eds.), From education policy to education practice: Unpacking the Nexus (pp. 287–304). Springer.
  • Prøitz, T. S., Rye, E., Borgen, J. S., Barstad, K., Afdal, H., Mausethagen, S., & Aasen, P. (2022). Education, learning, research. Report from an evaluation of the ULF initiative [Utbildning, lärande, forskning. Slutrapport från en utvärderingsstudie av ULF-försöksverksamhet]. Skriftserien nr 87. Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge.
  • SFS 2010:800 Skollag [Education Act].
  • Sjölund, S., & Lindvall, J. (2023). Examining boundaries in large-scale educational research-practice partnership. Journal of Educational Change, 25(2), 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09498-2
  • Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022). Using research to inform practice through research–practice partnerships: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 10(1), e3337. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3337
  • SOU 2018:19. Forska tillsammans – samverkan för lärande och förbättring. Betänkande av utredningen om praktiknära skolforskning i samverkan. In [Research together – collaboration for learning and improvement. Official Governmental Report.]. Norstedts Juridik AB.
  • Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001033
  • Strandler, O., & Harling, M. (2023). The problem of “problematic school absenteeism” – on the logics of institutional work with absent students’ well-being and knowledge development. European Education, 55(3–4), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2023.2251018
  • Tengberg, M., van Bommel, J., Nilsberth, M., Walkert, M., & Nissen, A. (2021). The quality of instruction in Swedish lower secondary language arts and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 760–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1910564
  • Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher–practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026007013
  • Wentworth, L., Arce-Trigatti, P., Conaway, C., & Shewchuk, S. (2023). Brokering in education research–practice partnerships. A guide for educational professionals and researchers. Routledge.
  • Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Research, 59(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1314108
  • Westbrook, H., Janssen, F., Mathijsen, I., Doyle, W, W., & Doyle, W. (2022). Teachers as researchers and the issue of practicality. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1803268
  • Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296