Pre-service teachers’ perception of technology competencies based on the new ISTE technology standards

References

• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantley-Dias, L., Kinuthia, W., Shoffner, M. B., de Castro, C., & Rigole, N. J. (2007). Developing pedagogical technology integration content knowledge in preservice teachers: A case study approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(4), 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E., Lee, Y., & Paik, S. (2017). The effects of programming-based lessons on science teachers’ perceptions related to TPACK. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 693–703.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Hong, S. H. (2019). Designing and implementing integrated lessons for preservice elementary teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(2), 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2018). CAEP 2018 K-6 Elementary Teacher Preparation Standards [Initial Licensure Programs]. http://www.ncate.org/accreditation/caep-accreditation/caep-k-6-elementary-teacher-standards
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation ((CAEP). (2019). 2013 CAEP Standards. http://caepnet.org/∼/media/Files/caep/standards/caep-standards-one-pager-0219.pdf?la=en
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
   Google Scholar
• Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.
   Google Scholar
• Halász, G., & Looney, J. (2019). Teacher professional competences and standards. Concepts and implementation. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., Ahn, Y., & Choi, Y. (2019). Teachers’ teaching competencies modeling in future schooling. Journal of Education & Culture (JOEC), 25(3), 365–388.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators: a guide for teachers and other professionals. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
   Google Scholar
• Jo, M. (2019). Elementary preservice teachers’ perception and readiness for future-oriented human resource development policies. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 23(5), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.5.451
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, F. S., McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (2009). Teaching the digital generation: No more Cookie-cutter high schools. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Min, M. (2018). A study on ICT competency of preliminary teachers based on PISA 2015 data. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 22(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.2.239
   Google Scholar
• Kimm, C. H., Kim, J., Baek, E. (2020). Preservice teachers’ perception of technology competencies based on the new technology standards [Paper presentation]. 2020 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kimm, C. H., Kim, J., Baek, E., & Chen, P. (2020). Preservice teachers’ confidence in their ISTE technology-competency. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 96–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1716896
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, T., Shin, H., Kim, K., Kim, J., Seo, J., Song, W., Jeong, Y., Choi, K., & Han, S. (2016). Learner centered PCK-based instructional designs of master teachers in secondary schools. Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st century Skills. (2019). http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
   Google Scholar
• Riegel, C. (2018). The development of the teacher preparation technology inventory (TPTI): An instrument designed to measure how often teacher candidates model and apply the 2017 international society for technology in education (ISTE) standards for educators in teacher preparation programs [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Niagara University.
   Google Scholar
• Riegel, C. (2019). Developing the Teacher Preparation Technology Inventory (TPTI) to evaluate teacher educator preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, K., & Lee, Y. (2017). Effects of online teacher learning community activities linked with internship course for the improvement of elementary preservice teacher’s TPACK. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(2), 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2019). Research methods for the people, by the people, of the people: Using a highly collaborative, multimethod approach to promote change. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(2), 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In Flick, U. (Ed.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Colony/Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry dictionary (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Team ISTE. (2017, February 6). Educators’ Feedback Key to Developing ISTE Standards for Teachers [Press release]. https://www.iste.org/explore/Press-Releases/Educators
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2018). ICT Competencies Framework for Teachers. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/pluginfile.php/306820/mod_resource/content/2/UNESCO%20ICT%20Competencies%20Framework%20V3.pdf
   Google Scholar