References

• Arnould, E. J., Price, L. L., & Zinkhan, G. L. (2002). Consumers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zhang, S. (2008). Experiential attributes and consumer Judgments. In H. S. Bernd & D. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook on brand and experience management (pp. 174–187). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Celsi, R. L., Rose, R. L., & Leigh, T. (1993, June). An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1–23.10.1086/jcr.1993.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1. Journal of Personality, 46(2), 228–243.10.1111/jopy.1978.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude- behavior consistency. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 14 (pp. 161–202). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence, 9, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986, September). Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 221–233.10.1086/jcr.1986.13.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (2000). The Millennial consumer in the texts of our times: Experience and entertainment. Journal of Macro Marketing, 20, 178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982, September). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1995, June). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1–16.10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, C., & Houston, M. J. (1993, September). Goal-oriented experiences and the development of knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 190–207.10.1086/jcr.1993.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Presence Research. (2000). The concept of presence: Explication Statement. Retrieved from http://ispr.info/
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (2003, September). Speaking of art as embodied imagination: A multisensory approach to understanding aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 259–282.10.1086/jcr.2003.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Lee, K. H. (2016). Influences of motivations and lifestyles on intentions to use smartphone applications. International Journal of Advertising. doi:10.1080/02650487.2016.1246510
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, K. H., & Taylor, C. R. (2013). Effects of mobile direct experience on perceived interactivity and attitude toward smartphone applications. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23(3), 282–296. doi:10.1080/21639159.2013.788365
   Google Scholar
• Kober, S. E., & Neuper, C. (2013). Personality and presence in virtual reality: Does their relationship depend on the used presence measure? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 13–25.10.1080/10447318.2012.668131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Kim, G. J. (2008). Effects of visual cues and sustained attention on spatial presence in virtual environments based on spatial and object distinction. Interacting with Computers, 20, 491–502.10.1016/j.intcom.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooy, S. C., & Robben, H. S. J. (2002). Managing consumers’ product evaluations through direct product experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11, 432–446.10.1108/10610420210451625
   Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan, A. V. (1995). Decision ambiguity and incumbent brand advantage. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 98–109.10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L., Rust, R. T., & Varki, S. (1997). Customer delight: Foundations, findings, and managerial insight. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 311–336.10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M., Balasubramanian, S. K., & Chakraborty, G. (2000). A comparative analysis of three communication formats: Advertising, informercial and direct experience. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 59–75.10.1080/00913367.2000.10673624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1983, August). Attitude-behavior consistency: The impact of product trial versus advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 257–267.10.2307/3151829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2017). Virtual reality (VR): Statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/2532/virtual-reality-vr/
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73–93.10.1111/jcom.1992.42.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, K., & Lee, Y. (2005). The effect of virtual reality on consumer learning: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 673–697.10.2307/25148705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usoh, M., & Slater, M. (1995). An exploration of immersive virtual environments. Endeavour, 19, 34–38.10.1016/0160-9327(95)98892-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G., & Walser, M. G. (2007). Building strong brands in retailing. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1–10.10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. A., & Lynch, J. G. (1995, March). Communication effects of advertising versus direct experience when both search and experience attributes are present. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 708–718.10.1086/jcr.1995.21.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar