Using National Student Survey (NSS) qualitative data and social identity theory to explore students’ experiences of assessment and feedback

References

• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M.A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317–334. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. The society for research into higher education & Open University Press (Vol. 31, 2nd ed.). SRHE & the Open University Press. doi:10.1306/74D70B87-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A.R., & Brooks, C. (2017). What makes students satisfied? A discussion and analysis of the UK’s national student survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, (September), 1–25. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349886
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., & Kane, S. (2014). Students’ interpretations of the meanings of questionnaire items in the National Student Survey. Quality in Higher Education, 20(2), 129–164. doi:10.1080/13538322.2014.924786
   Google Scholar
• Bergquist, W.H., & Pawlak, K. (2008). Engaging the six cultures of the academy: Revised and expanded edition of the four cultures of the academy (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27–52. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, B., Orr, S., & Yorke, M. (2012). Erm, That Question.. I Think I Probably Would’ve Just Put Something in the Middle and Sort of Moved on to the Next One, Because I Think It’s Really Unclear’: How art and design students understand and interpret the national student survey. Group for learning in art and design.
   Google Scholar
• Bliuc, A.M., Ellis, R.A., Goodyear, P., & Hendres, D.M. (2011). Understanding student learning in context: Relationships between university students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 417–433. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0065-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. (2012). ‘You can see the quality in front of your eyes’: Grounding academic standards between rationality and interpretation. Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 185–204. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.711071
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291–300. doi:10.1080/02602931003650045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., den-Outer, B., Hudson, J., & Price, M. (2016). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 466–481. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. In David Boud & Nancy Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, A. (2012). Making it count: Refecting on the national student survey in the process of enhancement. Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, A., Senior, C., & Moores, E. (2018). A 10-year case study on the changing determinants of university student satisfaction in the UK. PloS one, 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J.E. (1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 179–189. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.179
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocksedge, S.T., & Taylor, D.C.M. (2013). The national student survey: Is it just a bad DREEM? Medical Teacher, 35(12), e1638–e1643. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.835388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (1989). Triangulation. In J. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (p. 511). Toronto: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, M., & Crano, W.D. (2001). Outgroup accountability in the minimal group paradigm: Implications for aversive discrimination and social identity theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(3), 355–364. doi:10.1177/0146167201273009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunworth, K., & Sanchez, H.S. (2016). Perceptions of quality in staff-student written feedback in higher education: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 576–589. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of pualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229. doi:10.1348/014466599162782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUSA. (2016). What does good teaching look like to students? An analysis of teaching awards nomination data. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Student Association.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to qualitative research (pp. 432). Glasgow: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, V. (2014). Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures: Constraints or enablers to learning in higher education? Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2013.787981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03542.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2016). National Student Survey results 2016 - Higher Education Funding council for England. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20170110114820/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2016/Accessed08/04/2019
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states.Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational Contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. doi:10.2307/30040678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., Terry, D.J., & White, K.M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269. doi:10.2307/2787127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, A.M., Scott, N., Partington, S., & Oczujda, A. (2015). Coherence between text comments and the quantitative ratings in the UK’s national student survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 9486(February), 1–14. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000281
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M.R., & Street, B.V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M.R., & Street, B.V. (2006). The ‘academic literacies’ model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 366–377. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, J.R.D., Hughes, K., Lent, N., Marzetti, H., & Rhind, S.M. (2018). What do edinburgh students want? A mixed methods analysis of NSS 2016 free text data. In The University of Edinburgh learning and teaching conference: inspiring learning (pp. 19). Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, J., & Huxham, M. (2013). Feedback Unbound: From master to usher. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds.). Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue With Students (pp. 92–102). London
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S.E., & Born, M.P. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 528–545. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9168-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, I.P.S.O.S. (2017). The national student survey privacy statement. TheStudentSurvey.com. Retrieved from http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/privacy-statement.php
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T.F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G.D., & Schwarz, M.J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9088-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northedge, A. (2003). Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 169–180. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052429
   Google Scholar
• Northedge, A., & Mcarthur, J. (2009). Guiding students into a discipline: The significance of the teacher. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The University and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 107–118). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J.T.E., Slater, J.B., & Wilson, J. (2007). The national student survey: Development, findings and implications. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 557–580. doi:10.1080/03075070701573757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. (1985). The Origins and Functions of Evaluative Criteria. Educational Theory, 35(3), 285–297. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1985.00285.x
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, Kay (2013). Engaging students through assessment. In: Dunne, Elisabeth and Owen, Derfel, (eds.) The student engagement handbook: practice in higher education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, pp.379–396.
   Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2018). Better informing the market? The teaching excellence framework in british higher education. International Higher Education, 92, 21–22. doi:10.6017/ihe.2018.92.10283
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: The case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44–60. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Science Supplement, 1(Suppl), 173–191. doi:10.1017/S0021932000023336
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.057
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Worchel, S. and Austin, W.G., Eds., Psychology of Intergroup Relation, Hall Publishers, Chicago, 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W.G., & Lanford, M. (2017). Research in higher education: Cultural perspectives. In J. Shin & P. Teixeria (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–6). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education : Theories and practices. (N. Entwistle & R. King Eds.). China: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 5–34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twining, P., Heller, R.S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C.C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers and Education, 106, A1–A9. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardi, I. (2013). Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 599–610. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.670197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Kane, D., Sagu, S., & Smith, E. (2008). Assessment and feedback issues. Exploring the national student survey. The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (2009). ‘Student experience’ surveys: Some methodological considerations and an empirical investigation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 721–739. doi:10.1080/02602930802474219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Prebble, T. (2006). Being learner centred: One way to improve student retention? Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 587–600. doi:10.1080/03075070600923418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar