Science Club

References

• Afterschool Alliance. 2014. Full STEM ahead: Afterschool programs step up as key partners in STEM education. Washington, DC: Afterschool Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G.S., and O.J. Jegede. 1999. Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (3): 269–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1989. Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E.R., P.S. Smith, I.R. Weiss, K.A. Malzahn, K.M Campbell, and A.M. Weis. 2013. Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A.C., E. Tan, and A. Rivet. 2008. Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal 45 (1): 68–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M.R., E.A. Morgan, S.S. Strand, and T.A. Woolsey. 2006. Volunteers bring passion to science outreach. Science 314 (5803): 1246–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C.A. 2005. Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school. Science Education 89 (3): 392–417.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D.K., B.A. Crawford, and M.A. Constas. 2012. A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (3): 291–318.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B.A. 2012. Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: Engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In Issues and challenges in science education research, ed. K.C.D. Tan and M. Kim, 25–42. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, D.L., B.E. Holloway, J.C. Valentine, and H. Cooper. 2002. Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology 30 (2): 157–97.
   Google Scholar
• Every Child Matters Education Fund. 2015. After-school programs. www.everychildmatters.org/about/issues/after-school-programs.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., W. Huebner, A.S. Birnbaum, and M. Nicolich. 2014. Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education 98 (4): 549–80.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A.J. 2008. Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J.C., and V.J. Caracelli. 1997. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Direction for Program Evaluation 74: 1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, J., C. Lind, C. Hayes, J. McMaken, and A. Gersick. 2009. The cost of quality out-of-school-time programs. New York: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Family Research Project. 2010. Partnerships for learning: Promising practices in integrating school and out-of-school time program supports. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, N.M., B. Sánchez, M.A. Zimmerman, and C.H. Caldwell. 2012. Natural mentors, racial identity, and educational attainment among African American adolescents: Exploring pathways to success. Child Development 83 (4): 1196–212.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi, A., M. Ballard, and G.G. Noam. 2014. Examining the impact of afterschool STEM programs. Washington, DC: Afterschool Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K.E. Stiles, M.S.E. Mundry, N.B. Love, and P.W. Hewson. 2010. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luehmann, A.L., and D. Markowitz. 2007. Science teachers’ perceived benefits of an out‐of‐school enrichment programme: Identity needs and university affordances. International Journal of Science Education 29 (9): 1133–61.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J.A., A. Wong, and I. Ortega. 2009. State of science education survey. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, D.J., E. Young, R. Balfanz, A. Shaw, M. Garriott, and A. Cohen. 2001. High quality learning opportunities in high poverty middle schools: Moving from rhetoric to reality. In Reinventing the Middle School, ed. T.S. Dickinson, 155–75.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese, A., and R. Tai. 2010. Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education 32 (5): 669–85.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2009. Teens prepared for math, science careers, yet lack mentors. http://news.mit.edu/2009/lemelson-teens-0107.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, M.L., and J. Fisher. 2009. Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne Program. BMC Public Health 9 (41): 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC) and the Institute of Medicine. 2004. Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. 2008. A new day for youth: Creating sustainable quality in out-of-school time. New York: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G., G. Biancarosa, and N. Dechausay. 2003. Afterschool education: Approaches to an emerging field. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G., and A.M. Shah. 2013. Game-changers and the assessment predicament in afterschool science. Belmont, MA: Program in Education, Afterschool, and Resiliency (PEAR) at Harvard University. www.pearweb.org/research/pdfs/Noam%26Shah_Science_Assessment_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Popp, P.A., L.W. Grant, and J.H. Stronge. 2011. Effective teachers for at-risk or highly mobile students: What are the dispositions and behaviors of award-winning teachers? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 16 (4): 275–91.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, T., M. de la Torre, W.D. Stevens, and E.M. Allensworth. 2014. Free to fail or on-track to college: Why grades drop when students enter high school and what adults can do about it. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Santamaria, L.J. 2009. Culturally responsive differentiated instruction: Narrowing gaps between best pedagogical practices benefiting all learners. The Teachers College Record 111 (1): 214–47.
   Google Scholar
• Scogin, S.C., and C.L. Stuessy. 2015. Encouraging greater student inquiry engagement in science through motivational support by online scientist-mentors. Science Education 99 (2): 312–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipe, C.L. 2002. Mentoring programs for adolescents: A research summary. The Journal of Adolescent Health 31 (6): 251–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P., J.B. Diamond, L.J. Walker, R. Halverson, and L. Jita. 2001. Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (8): 918–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, R.H., C. Qi Liu, A.V. Maltese, and X. Fan. 2006. Planning early for careers in science. Science 312 (5777): 1143–44.
   Google Scholar
• Teel, K.M., A. Debruin-Parecki, and M.V. Covington. 1998. Teaching strategies that honor and motivate inner-city African-American students: A school/university collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education 14 (5): 479–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, L.S., M.K. Anderson, M. Jett, and D.L. Yourick. 2014. An innovative near-peer mentoring model for undergraduate and secondary students: STEM focus. Innovative Higher Education 39 (5): 375–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A., and J. McTighe. 2006. Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H. 2005. Secondary education systemic issues: Addressing possible contributors to a leak in the science education pipeline and potential solutions. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (2): 205–16.
   Google Scholar