Choice and voice: emerging questions of personalised professional learning

References

• Alamri, H., et al. 2020. Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52 (3), 322–352. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azukas, M.E., 2019. Cultivating blended communities of practice to promote personalized learning. Journal of online learning research, 5 (3), 251–274: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241727.pdf Accessed 10 Jan 2022
   Google Scholar
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2014. Teachers know best: teachers’ views on professional development. Available from: http://k12education.gatesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Gates-PDMarketResearch-Dec5.pdf [Accessed 10 Jan 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., and Koellner, K., 2010. Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7 (2), 548–556.
   Google Scholar
• The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2018. Voices from the field: National perspectives on equity and personalized learning. Washington, DC. Available from: https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/VFTF%202018%20FINAL.pdf [Accessed 10 Jan 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S.L., Smith, S.J., and Frey, B.B., 2022. Professional development with universal design for learning: supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48 (1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., and Andree, A., 2010. How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., and Gardner, M., 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M., 1985. Toward an organismic integration theory. In: Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior Aronson, Elliot ed. Boston, MA: Springer, 113–148.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, L.B., 2008. From professional development to professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 89 (10), 755–761. doi:10.1177/003172170808901014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act. 20 U.S.C. § 6301, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdig, R.E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. and Mouza, C. ., 2020. Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gamrat, C., et al., 2014. Personalized workplace learning: an exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45 (6), 1136–1148. doi:10.1111/bjet.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A.B. and Trespalacios, J., 2019. Personalized professional learning and teacher self-efficacy for integrating technology in K–12 classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35 (4), 221–235. doi:10.1080/21532974.2019.1647579
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B.R. and Showers, B., 1981. Transfer of training: the contribution of “coaching”. Journal of Education, 163 (2), 163–172. doi:10.1177/002205748116300208
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K., Miyashiro, D., and Baird, T., 2015. Technology integration in diverse contexts: models of competency-based professional learning in three school districts. In: T. Brown and H. van der Merwe, eds., The mobile learning voyage - from small ripples to massive open waters. mLearn 2015. New York: Springer. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., Rose, D.H. and Gordon, D.T., 2014. Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V.D. and Pedder, D., 2011. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81 (3), 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, S., et al., 2016. Promising state policies for personalized learning. Available from: http://www.aurora-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/iNACOL-Promising-State-Policies-for-Personalized-Learning.pdf [Accessed 10 Jan 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Popp, J.S. and Goldman, S.R., 2016. Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347–359. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, R., Sacks, L., and Twyman, J.S., 2017. Equity and personalized learning: a research review. Washington, DC: Prepared by The Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D., Meredith, J., and Butler, A.N., 2019. State responsibilities and opportunities for school improvement under the every student succeed act. Washington, DC: Prepared by The Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.M. and Olson-Buchanan, J., 2016. Using job embeddedness to explain new teacher retention. Education Leadership Review, 17 (1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., et al. 2021. A path forward: professional development as a means to support personalised learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47 (2), 296–299. doi:10.1080/02607476.2021.1885286
   Google Scholar
• Yurtseven Avci, Z., O'Dwyer, L.M. and Lawson, J., 2020. Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), pp.160–177.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Basham, J.D., and Yang, S., 2020a. Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: a research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100339. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Yang, S., and Carter, R.A., 2020b. Personalized learning and ESSA: what we know and where we go. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52 (3), 253–274. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar