Publication Cover
PRACTICE
Contemporary Issues in Practitioner Education
Volume 4, 2022 - Issue 3
2,358
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using a teacher knowledge framework to connect teaching practice with theory

, , &
Pages 191-211 | Received 16 Nov 2021, Accepted 18 Aug 2022, Published online: 14 Oct 2022

References

  • Adriansen, H.K. and Madsen, L.M., 2019. Capacity-building projects in African higher education. Issues of coloniality in international academic collaboration. Learning and teaching, 12 (2), 1–23. doi:10.3167/latiss.2019.120202
  • Alexander, R.J., 2009. Pedagogy, culture and the power of comparison. In: H. Daniels, H. Lauder, and J. Porter, Eds. Educational theories, cultures and learning: a critical perspective. London: Routledge, 10–26.
  • Ali, N.L., Hamid, M.O., and Moni, K., 2011. English in primary education in Malaysia: policies, outcomes and stakeholders’ lived experiences. Current issues in language planning, 12 (2), 147–166. doi:10.1080/14664208.2011.584371
  • Banks, F., Leach, J., and Moon, B., 2005. Extract from new understandings of teachers’ pedagogic knowledge. Curriculum journal, 16 (3), 331–340. doi:10.1080/09585170500256446
  • Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A., 1991. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf [Accessed 9 Sep 2021]
  • Bruner, J.S., 1974. Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Chambers, P., et al., 2003. Significant learning incidents and critical conversations in an international context: promoting reflexivity with in-service students. Journal of in-service education, 29 (1), 101–122. doi:10.1080/13674580300200199
  • Cianciolo, A.T., et al. 2006. Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. In: K. Anders Ericsson, et al., Eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 613–632.
  • Confrey, J., 1990. What constructivism implies for teaching. Journal for research in mathematics education, Monograph, 4, 107–122+195–210. doi:10.2307/749916
  • Darling-Hammond, L. and Lieberman, A., eds., 2012. Teacher education around the world: changing policies and practices. London: Routledge.
  • Denzin, N.K., 2009. The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Brunswick: Transaction.
  • Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., and Kelchtermans, G., 2013. Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and teacher education, 34, 12–25. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001
  • Department for Education., 2010. The importance of teaching. The schools white paper. 2010. Cm 7980 Norwich: The Stationery Office. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175429/CM-7980.pdf [Accessed 17 May 2022] Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
  • Dickerson, C., et al., 2011. Learning together through international collaboration in teacher education in Malaysia. Report of a project to develop a Bachelor of Education (Honours) in Primary Mathematics. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
  • Dickerson, C., et al., 2017. Using action, reflection and modelling (ARM) in Malaysian primary schools: connecting ‘the ARM theory’ with student teachers’ reported practice. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 23 (4), 494–514. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1211101
  • Dickerson, C., et al., 2018. Changing practice in Malaysian primary schools: learning from student teachers’ reports of using action, reflection and modelling (ARM). Journal of education for teaching, 44 (2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/02607476.2018.1433468
  • Dickerson, C., et al., 2021. The role of pupils in developing student teachers’ knowledge of teaching. Journal of education for teaching, 47 (4), 475–494. doi:10.1080/02607476.2021.1890985
  • Donnelly, J. and Berry, L., 2019. Considering the environment: an expanded framework for teacher knowledge. Journal of learning spaces, 8 (1), 42–49.
  • Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia, 2015. Eleventh Malaysia Plan 2016-2020. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Economic Planning Unit.
  • Eraut, M., 1985. Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts. Studies in higher education, 10 (2), 117–133. doi:10.1080/03075078512331378549
  • Eraut, M., 2000. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British journal of educational psychology, 70 (1), 113–136. doi:10.1348/000709900158001
  • Eraut, M., 2001. Teachers learning in the workplace. In: A. Kesidou, ed. Continuing teacher education and school development (symposium proceedings). Thessaloniki, Greece: Department of Education, School of Philosophy AUTH, pp. 54–68.
  • Eraut, M., 2004. Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education, 26 (2), 247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245
  • Eraut, M., 2007. Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford review of education, 33 (4), 403–422. doi:10.1080/03054980701425706
  • Eraut, M., 2009. Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In: H. Daniels, H. Lauder, and J. Porter, Eds. Knowledge, values and educational policy. Abingdon: Routledge, 65–84.
  • Eraut, M. and Hirsh, W., 2007. The significance of workplace learning for individuals, groups and organisations. Oxford: Skope.
  • Faryadi, Q., et al., 2007. Welcome constructivism, bye-bye every ism! Paper presented at the International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, 13-16 November, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Goh, P.S.C. and Blake, D., 2015. Teacher preparation in Malaysia: needed changes. Teaching in higher education, 20 (5), 469–480. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020780
  • Goldenberg, C., 1991. Instructional conversations and their classroom application. Educational Practice Report: 2. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, Santa Cruz, CA. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED341253.pdf [Accessed 9 September 2021]
  • Grimmett, P.P., 1989. A commentary on Schön’s view of reflection. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 5 (1), 19–28.
  • Grimmett, P.P. and Mackinnon, A.M., 1992. Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of research in education, 18 (1), 385–456. doi:10.3102/0091732X018001385
  • Hallinger, P., 2010. Making education reform happen: is there an ‘Asian’ way? School leadership & management, 30 (5), 401–418. doi:10.1080/13632434.2010.502524
  • Hargreaves, A., 1998. The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 14 (8), 835–854. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0
  • Herold, F., 2019. Shulman, or Shulman and Shulman? How communities and contexts affect the development of pre-service teachers’ subject knowledge. Teacher development, 23 (4), 488–505. doi:10.1080/13664530.2019.1637773
  • Illeris, K., ed., 2009. Contemporary theories of learning. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Jarvis, J., et al., 2014. The action–reflection–modelling (ARM) pedagogical approach for teacher education: a Malaysia-UK project. Australian journal of teacher education, 39 (3), 89–118. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.2
  • Jarvis, S., et al., 2016. Supporting professional learning and development through international collaboration in the co-construction of an undergraduate teaching qualification. Professional development in education, 42 (3), 403–422. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1026454
  • Kabilan, M.K. and Izzaham, R.I.R., 2008. Challenges faced and the strategies adopted by a Malaysian English Language teacher during teaching practice. English language teaching, 1 (1), 87–95. doi:10.5539/elt.v1n1p87
  • Keikelame, M.J. and Swartz, L., 2019. Decolonising research methodologies: lessons from a qualitative research project, Cape Town, South Africa. Global health action, 12 (1), 1561175. doi:10.1080/16549716.2018.1561175
  • Kessels, J.P.A.M. and Korthagen, F.A.J., 1996. The relationship between theory and practice: back to the classics. Educational researcher, 25 (3), 17–22. doi:10.3102/0013189X025003017
  • King, F., 2020. In conversation with. PRACTICE: Contemporary issues in practitioner education, 2 (2), 105–109. doi:10.1080/25783858.2020.1831734
  • Koo, Y.L., 2008. Language, Culture and Literacy: meaning-making in Global Contexts. Bangi, Malaysia: Fakulti Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  • Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., and Russell, T., 2006. Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and teacher education, 22 (8), 1020–1041. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
  • Krippendorff, K., 2019. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Leech, N.L. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2008. Qualitative data analysis: a compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23 (4), 587–604. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587
  • Leu, E. and Price-Rom, A., 2006. Quality of education and teacher learning: a review of the literature. Washington, DC: USAID Educational Quality Improvement Program.
  • Lim, C.S. and Chew, C.M., 2007. Mathematical communication in Malaysian bilingual classrooms. Paper presented at the APEC-Tsukuba International Conference, 9-14 December. Tokyo, Japan.
  • Loughran, J., 2006. Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., and Swennen, A., 2007. The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and teacher education, 23 (5), 586–601. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001
  • Mahmud, M.S., 2019. The role of wait time in the process of oral questioning in the teaching and learning process of mathematics. International journal of advanced science and technology, 28 (16), 691–697.
  • Mason, J., 2011. Noticing: roots and branches. In: M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, and R. Philipp, Eds. Mathematics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge, 35–50.
  • Ministry of Education Malaysia., 2001. Education development plan for Malaysia 2001-2010. Executive Summary. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education. Available from: https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ressources/malaysia_education_development_plan_2001-2010_summary.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2021].
  • Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2006. Integrated curriculum for primary schools. Curriculum specifications - mathematics year 6. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education.
  • Ministry of Education Malaysia., 2013. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. Available from: https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dasar/1207-malaysia-education-blueprint-2013-2025/file [Accessed 20 October 2021]
  • Olson, M.R., 2000. Linking personal and professional knowledge of teaching practice through narrative inquiry. The teacher educator, 35 (4), 109–127. doi:10.1080/08878730009555241
  • Parker, M., Patton, K., and O’Sullivan, M., 2016. Signature pedagogies in support of teachers’ professional learning. Irish educational studies, 35 (2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/03323315.2016.1141700
  • Piaget, J., 1954. The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Roberts, N., 2021. The school curriculum in England. House of Commons Library briefing paper 06798. Available from: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06798/SN06798.pdf [Accessed 19 May 2022] Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/open-parliament-licence/
  • Ryan, J., 2020. Transforming academic cultures: relationships, respect and reciprocity. Journal of academic language and learning, 14 (2), 1–19. Available from: https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/647 [Accessed 29 October 2021]
  • Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R., 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field methods, 15 (1), 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
  • Scheiner, T., et al., 2019. What makes mathematics teacher knowledge specialized? Offering alternative views. International journal of science and mathematics education, 17 (1), 153–172. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9859-6
  • Schön, D.A., 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Shulman, L.S., 1986. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15 (2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L.S., 1987. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57 (1), 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Shulman, L.S., 1998. Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The elementary school journal, 98 (5), 511–526. doi:10.1086/461912
  • Shulman, L.S., 2004. The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shulman, L., 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134 (3), 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
  • Shulman, L.S. and Shulman, J.H., 2004. How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of curriculum studies, 36 (2), 257–271. doi:10.1080/0022027032000148298
  • Sibieta, L. and Jerrim, J. 2021. A comparison of school institutions and policies across the UK. London: Education Policy Institute Available from: https://epi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/EPI-UK-Institutions-Comparisons-2021.pdf [Accessed 19 May 2022]
  • Singh, M. and Shrestha, M., 2008. International Pedagogical Structures. In: M. Hellstén and A. Reid, eds. Researching International Pedagogies. Dordrecht: Springer, 65-82. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8858-2_5
  • Terry, G. and Braun, V., 2017. Short but often sweet: the surprising potential of qualitative survey methods. In: V. Braun, V. Clarke, and D. Gray, Eds. Collecting qualitative data: a practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–44.
  • Tigchelaar, A. and Korthagen, F., 2004. Deepening the exchange of student teaching experiences: implications for the pedagogy of teacher education of recent insights into teacher behaviour. Teaching and teacher education, 20 (7), 665–679. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.008
  • van Manen, M., 1991. Can teaching be taught? or are real teachers found or made? Phenomenology + pedagogy, 9, 182–199.
  • van Manen, M., 2008. Pedagogical sensitivity and teachers practical knowing-in-action. Peking University education review, 1 (1), 1–23.
  • van Manen, M., 2016. Pedagogical tact. Knowing what to do when you don’t know what to do. London: Routledge.
  • Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., and Meijer, P., 2001. Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International journal of educational research, 35 (5), 441–461. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
  • Vighnarajah Luan, W.S. and Bakar, K.A., 2008. The shift in the role of teachers in the learning process. European journal of social sciences, 7 (2), 33–41.
  • Vygotsky, L., 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 79–91.
  • Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S. and Richert, A.E., 1987. ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In: J. Calderhead, ed. Exploring teachers’ thinking. London: Cassell Academic, 104-124.
  • Windschitl, M., 2002. Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: an analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of educational research, 72 (2), 131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
  • Winter, C., 2014. Curriculum knowledge, justice, relations: the schools white paper (2010) in England. Journal of philosophy of education, 48 (2), 276–292. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12061