Characterization and development of critically-thinker EFL readers’ reading ability: AWC vs. QAR approaches

References

• Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometrics issues. Educational Assessment, 8(3), 231–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0803_02
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCN025
   Google Scholar
• Alhujaylan, H. (2021). Academic vocabulary acquisition in web-based learning environment. Asian ESP Journal, 17(33), 32–57.
   Google Scholar
• Auzmendi, E., Villa, A., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a newly constructed multiple choice creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, S. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Birjandi, P., Bagheri, M. B., & Maftoon, P. (2019). Towards an operational definition of critical thinking. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12(24), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.30495/JAL.2019.671910
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd) ed.). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, P. (2010). Creativity in Hong Kong schools. World Englishes, 29(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2021.01677.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, C. W. (2016). Critical theory and contemporary paradigm differentiation. Acta Commercii, 16(2), 59–99 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ac.v16i2.421.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking and discourse level writing skill through teachers’ questions: A sociocultural approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2019-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, P. T. M. (2011). The effects of vocabulary knowledge and background knowledge on reading comprehension of Taiwanese EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. R., Freisner, D., & Khayum, M. (2003). Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2003.10850147
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-method research (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, J. (1996). Learning in small groups. Medical Teacher, 18(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danvers, E. C. (2016). Criticality’s affective entanglements: Rethinking emotion and critical thinking in higher education. Gender and Education, 28(2), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1115469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2015). A model of critical thinking in higher education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 1–26). Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, T. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking through engagement with multiplicity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Cosgrove, R. (2019). Critical societies: Thoughts from the past. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved May 26, 2020, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-societies-thoughts-from-thepast/762
   Google Scholar
• Ennir, R. (1991a). Critical thinking: A working concept. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19911412
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. (1991). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5–24. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/ennisstreamlinedconception_002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19911412
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2378
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. R., & Kernberger, C. (2006). The pocket guide to critical thinking (3rd). Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, M. (2021). Smashing down “Old” ways of thinking: Uncritical critical thinking in teacher education. One World in Dialogue, 6(1), 26–38. https://ssc.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/OneWorldInDialogue/2021%20V6N1/Smashing%20Down%20Old%20Ways.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. (1990). Executive Summary of Critical Thinking: A statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Femilia, P. S. (2018). Critical reading strategies employed by good critical readers of graduate students in ELT, State University of Malang. TEFLA Journal, 1(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.35747/tefla.v1i1.196
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, L., & Pastell, H. (2012). Question answer relationship strategy increases reading comprehension among kindergarten students. Applied Research on English Language, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2012.15443
   Google Scholar
• Gabennesch, H. (2006). Critical thinking: What is it good for? Skeptical Inquirer, 30(2), 36–41. https://www.scicop.org/si/2006-02/thinking.html
   Google Scholar
• Gamboa-González, Á. M. (2017). Reading comprehension in an English as a foreign language setting: Teaching strategies for sixth graders based on the interactive model of reading. Folios, 45(1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.45folios159.175
   Google Scholar
• Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Geothals, S. M., Howard, A. R., & Sanders, M. M. (2004). Student teaching: A process approach to reflective practice. A guide for pre-service and in-service teacher (2nd) ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, E. M. (1941). . In An experiment in the development of critical thinking. J. J. Little and Ives Company .
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., & Fleming, P. J. (2015). Mixed methods research. In G. Guest & E. Namey (Eds.), Public Health Research Methods (pp. 581–610). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haavind, S. (2006). Key factors of online course design and instructor facilitation that enhance collaborative dialogue among learners. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=50868d5ac3dfaf21a793d5b4b0d75a0bb47eed15
   Google Scholar
• Habbash, M. (2021). Using internet-based reading activities to enhance the face-to-face teaching of reading in community college at the university of Tabuk. Asian EFL Journal, 28(3), 10–22. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/2021-monthly-edition/volume-28-issue-3-2-june-2021/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L., & Piazza, S. (2008). Critically reading texts: What students do and how teachers can help. Reading Teacher, 62(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A. (2005). Incorporating critical thinking skills development into ESL/EFL courses. The Internet TESL Journal, XI(3), 1–6. https://iteslj.org/Techniques/Halvorsen-CriticalThinking.html
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, W., Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V., Petska, K., & Creswell, J. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, R. M., & Crosby, J. (2000). AMEE education guide no. 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/014215900409429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social presence, and teaching presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas, H. P. (2018). Indonesian EFL teachers’ conceptions of critical thinking. Journal of ELT Research, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_Vol3Issue1pp29-37
   Google Scholar
• Imperio, A., Staarman, J. K., & Basso, D. (2020). Relevance of the socio-cultural perspective in the discussion about critical thinking. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6092/.1970-2221/9882
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social Interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 9–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of argumentation models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(9), 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0809.01
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Doris, Y., Leung, A. J., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
   Google Scholar
• Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://www.depauw.edu/files/resources/krathwohl.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, S. M., Choi, I., & Ge, X. (2007). Scaffolding online discussions to promote reflection and revision of understanding. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(4), 409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2000). Critical issues: Limits of identification: The personal, pleasurable and critical reader response. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P., & D’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loving, G. (1993). Competence validation and cognitive flexibility: A theoretical model grounded in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 32(9), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19931101-07
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mace, G. M. (2005). An index of intactness. Nature, 434(7029), 32–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/434032a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malterud, M., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The Melbourne decision making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<1::AID-BDM242>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, L. F. S. (2020). Critical thinking perspectives across contexts and curricula: Dominant, neglected, and complementing dimensions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2010). Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(9), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.009
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., Abbasian, G. R., & Siyyari, M. (2022). Adaptation and validation of a critical thinking scale to measure 3d critical thinking ability of EFL readers. Language Testing in Asia, 12(24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00173-6
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho, D. A. (2012). The effectiveness of Question and Answer Relationship (QAR) method in teaching reading viewed from students’ intelligence: An experimental study in the Second Year of SMPN 2 Madiun in the Academic Year of 2011/2012. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], University of Surakarta.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, H. F., Abedi, J., & Spielberg, C. D. (1994). The measurement and teaching of creativity. In H. F. O’Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: theory and research (pp. 245–264). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pabel, A., Pryce, J., & Anderson, A. (2021). Embarking on the paradigm journey. In A. Pabel, J. Pryce, & A. Anderson (Eds.), Research paradigm considerations for emerging scholars (pp. 1–12). Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, A. M., & Perez, W. (2003). Acculturation, social perspective, and social cognition: A new perspective. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303251694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. B. (2015). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S. G. R., Hoon, T. L., Khoo, S. F., & Joseph, I. M. (2007). The impact of Question-Answer-Relationship on reading comprehension. Pie Chun public school and Marymount convent. Ministry of education.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical Pedagogy and Second Language Education. System, 18(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(90)90003-N
   Google Scholar
• Pishghadam, R., Noghani, M., & Zabihi, R. (2011). The Construct Validation of a Questionnaire of Social and Cultural Capital. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p195
   Google Scholar
• Pishvaei, V., & Kasaian, S. A. (2013). Design, construction, and validation of a critical pedagogy attitude questionnaire in Iran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Verdugo, M. D., & Márquez, E. (2021). A sociocultural study on English learners’ critical thinking skills and competence. In E. Hanci-Azizoglu & M. Alawdat (Eds.), Rhetoric and sociolinguistics in times of global crisis (pp. 79–99). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., George, M., Weber, C. M., & Nies, A. (2009). Approaches to teaching reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 449–469). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., Highfield, K., & Au, K. H. (2006). QAR now: A powerful and practical framework that develops comprehension and high-level thinking in all students. Scholastic, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. H. (1998). Effect of a model for critical thinking on student achievement in primary source document analysis and interpretation, argumentative reasoning, critical thinking dispositions, and history content in a community college history course. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2002). The argument schema and learning to reason. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp.319-334). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J. C. (2003). The Efficacy of Leadership Development, Critical Thinking Dispositions, and Students Academic Performance on the Critical Thinking Skills of Selected Youth Leaders. [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury University. (2013). 7 critical reading strategies. http://www.salisbury.edu
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman, S., & Mabunda, P. L. (2011). Teaching practice and the personal and socio-professional development of prospective teachers. South African Journal of Education, 32(3), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n3a581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2006). Creativity around the world in 80 ways … but with one destination. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international Handbook of Creativity (pp. 490–496). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818240.017
   Google Scholar
• Sinaga, P., & Feranie, S. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking skills and writing skills through the variation in non-traditional writing task. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1025a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, A. D., & Stanton, W. W. (2017). Using journaling to enhance learning and critical thinking in a retailing course. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 25, 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W., & Zhang, J. (2010). A web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Method Research, 1(3), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tishman, S., & Andrade, A. (1996). Thinking dispositions: A review of current theories, practices, and issues. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Untailawan, F. (2020). Improving students’ reading comprehension and critical thinking skills through the implementation of qar strategy at SMA PGRI dobo. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i1.1721
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. (2017). An exploration into research on critical thinking and its cultivation: An overview. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1266–1280. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.14
   Google Scholar
• Weiner Green, S., & Weiner, M. (2012). Barron’s new SAT reading workbook (14th) ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the Wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995. https://odi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. (2017). A research on the effective questioning strategies in Class. Science Journal of Education, 5(4), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SJEDU.20170504.16
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y., & Tsai, J. J. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.528881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2022). Revisiting the notion of critical thinking in higher education: Theorizing the thinking-feeling entanglement using affect theory. Teaching in Higher Education, Teaching in Higher Education., 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2078961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar