588
Views
277
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise

Pages 79-87 | Received 24 Sep 1981, Published online: 12 Oct 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (99)

Merve Meral & Özlem Konukseven. (2023) Effect of noise on speech intelligibility and cognitive skills by ages. Speech, Language and Hearing 0:0, pages 1-9.
Read now
Eylem Saraç Kaya, Meral Didem Türkyılmaz & Mehmet Yaralı. (2023) The evaluation of cochlear implant users’ acoustic change detection ability. Hearing, Balance and Communication 21:2, pages 130-138.
Read now
C. J. James, Marie-Laurence Laborde, C. Algans, M. Tartayre, N. Cochard, B. Fraysse, O. Deguine, M. Marx & C. Karoui. (2023) The French MBAA2 sentence recognition in noise test for cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 62:4, pages 304-311.
Read now
Victoria Stenbäck, Erik Marsja, Rachel Ellis & Jerker Rönnberg. (2023) Relationships between behavioural and self-report measures in speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology 62:2, pages 101-109.
Read now
Hongmei Hu, Sabine Hochmuth, Chi Kwong Man, Anna Warzybok, Birger Kollmeier & Lena L. N. Wong. (2022) Development and evaluation of the Cantonese matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology 0:0, pages 1-13.
Read now
Rachel J. Ellis & Jerker Rönnberg. (2022) Temporal fine structure: associations with cognition and speech-in-noise recognition in adults with normal hearing or hearing impairment. International Journal of Audiology 61:9, pages 778-786.
Read now
Miriam H. Kropp, Thomas Hocke, Parwis Agha-Mir-Salim & Alexander Müller. (2021) Evaluation of a synthetic version of the digits-in-noise test and its characteristics in CI recipients. International Journal of Audiology 60:7, pages 507-513.
Read now
Antti Kuusinen, Eero Saariniemi, Ville Sivonen, Aarno Dietz, Antti A. Aarnisalo & Tapio Lokki. (2021) An exploratory investigation of speech recognition thresholds in noise with auralisations of two reverberant rooms. International Journal of Audiology 60:3, pages 210-219.
Read now
Tytti Willberg, Ville Sivonen, Saija Hurme, Antti A. Aarnisalo, Heikki Löppönen & Aarno Dietz. (2020) The long-term learning effect related to the repeated use of the Finnish matrix sentence test and the Finnish digit triplet test. International Journal of Audiology 59:10, pages 753-762.
Read now
Tytti Willberg, Karissa Kärtevä, Melanie Zokoll, Michael Buschermöhle, Ville Sivonen, Antti Aarnisalo, Heikki Löppönen, Birger Kollmeier & Aarno Dietz. (2020) The Finnish simplified matrix sentence test for the assessment of speech intelligibility in the elderly. International Journal of Audiology 59:10, pages 763-771.
Read now
Cristina Rigato, Sabine Reinfeldt & Filip Asp. (2020) The effect of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device on spatial release from masking. International Journal of Audiology 59:5, pages 348-359.
Read now
Elaine Hoi Ning Ng & Jerker Rönnberg. (2020) Hearing aid experience and background noise affect the robust relationship between working memory and speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology 59:3, pages 208-218.
Read now
Bo Håkansson, Sabine Reinfeldt, Ann-Charlotte Persson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Cristina Rigato, Malou Hultcrantz & Måns Eeg-Olofsson. (2019) The bone conduction implant – a review and 1-year follow-up. International Journal of Audiology 58:12, pages 945-955.
Read now
Jerker Rönnberg, Emil Holmer & Mary Rudner. (2019) Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding. International Journal of Audiology 58:5, pages 247-261.
Read now
Jens Nirme, Magnus Haake, Viveka Lyberg Åhlander, Jonas Brännström & Birgitta Sahlén. (2019) A virtual speaker in noisy classroom conditions: supporting or disrupting children’s listening comprehension?. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 44:2, pages 79-86.
Read now
Hongmei Hu, Xin Xi, Lena L. N. Wong, Sabine Hochmuth, Anna Warzybok & Birger Kollmeier. (2018) Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology 57:11, pages 838-850.
Read now
Konstantina Koloutsou, Dimitris Kikidis, George Spanoudakis, Athanasios Bibas & Thomas Nikolopoulos. (2017) Speech audiometry test with picture-related sentence lists in Modern Greek for partially hearing children. Hearing, Balance and Communication 15:4, pages 187-198.
Read now
Kishore Tanniru, Vijaya Kumar Narne, Chandni Jain, Sreeraj Konadath, Niraj Kumar Singh, K. J. Ramadevi Sreenivas & Anusha K.. (2017) Development of equally intelligible Telugu sentence-lists to test speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology 56:9, pages 664-671.
Read now
Heather Kelly, Gaven Lin, Narayan Sankaran, Jing Xia, Sridhar Kalluri & Simon Carlile. (2017) Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English. International Journal of Audiology 56:2, pages 85-91.
Read now
Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner, Elaine Hoi Ning Ng, Björn Lidestam, Adriana Agatha Zekveld, Patrik Sörqvist, Björn Lyxell, Ulf Träff, Wycliffe Yumba, Elisabet Classon, Mathias Hällgren, Birgitta Larsby, Carine Signoret, M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Mary Rudner, Henrik Danielsson & Stefan Stenfelt. (2016) Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study. International Journal of Audiology 55:11, pages 623-642.
Read now
Victoria Stenbäck, Mathias Hällgren & Birgitta Larsby. (2016) Executive functions and working memory capacity in speech communication under adverse conditions. Speech, Language and Hearing 19:4, pages 218-226.
Read now
Elisabeth Ingo, K. Jonas Brännström, Gerhard Andersson, Thomas Lunner & Ariane Laplante-Lévesque. (2016) Measuring motivation using the transtheoretical (stages of change) model: A follow-up study of people who failed an online hearing screening. International Journal of Audiology 55:sup3, pages S52-S58.
Read now
Eline Borch Petersen, Thomas Lunner, Martin D. Vestergaard & Elisabet Sundewall Thorén. (2016) Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance. International Journal of Audiology 55:4, pages 254-261.
Read now
Virginia Best, Gitte Keidser, Jӧrg M. Buchholz & Katrina Freeston. (2016) Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension. International Journal of Audiology 55:1, pages 45-52.
Read now
Hamidreza Taghavi, Bo Håkansson, Sabine Reinfeldt, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Emil Håkansson & Bayan Nasri. (2015) Technical design of a new bone conduction implant (BCI) system. International Journal of Audiology 54:10, pages 736-744.
Read now
Sabine Reinfeldt, Bo Håkansson, Hamidreza Taghavi, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson & Måns Eeg-Olofsson. (2015) The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients. International Journal of Audiology 54:6, pages 408-416.
Read now
Nina Wardenga, Cornelia Batsoulis, Kirsten C. Wagener, Thomas Brand, Thomas Lenarz & Hannes Maier. (2015) Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 71-79.
Read now
Melanie A. Zokoll, Dilek Fidan, Didem Türkyılmaz, Sabine Hochmuth, İclâl Ergenç, Gonca Sennaroğlu & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 51-61.
Read now
Aarno Dietz, Michael Buschermöhle, Ville Sivonen, Tytti Willberg, Antti A. Aarnisalo, Thomas Lenarz & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 80-87.
Read now
Anna Warzybok, Thomas Brand, Kirsten C. Wagener & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 88-99.
Read now
Marc René Schädler, Anna Warzybok, Sabine Hochmuth & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 100-107.
Read now
Michael A. Akeroyd, Stig Arlinger, Ruth A. Bentler, Arthur Boothroyd, Norbert Dillier, Wouter A. Dreschler, Jean-Pierre Gagné, Mark Lutman, Jan Wouters, Lena Wong & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 17-22.
Read now
Birger Kollmeier, Anna Warzybok, Sabine Hochmuth, Melanie A. Zokoll, Verena Uslar, Thomas Brand & Kirsten C. Wagener. (2015) The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 3-16.
Read now
Anna Warzybok, Melanie Zokoll, Nina Wardenga, Edward Ozimek, Maria Boboshko & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 35-43.
Read now
T.E.M. Van Esch, M.E. Lutman, M. Vormann, J. Lyzenga, M. Hällgren, B. Larsby, S.P. Athalye, T. Houtgast, B. Kollmeier & W.A. Dreschler. (2015) Relations between psychophysical measures of spatial hearing and self-reported spatial-hearing abilities. International Journal of Audiology 54:3, pages 182-189.
Read now
Rebecca Carroll, Markus Meis, Michael Schulte, Matthias Vormann, Jürgen Kießling & Hartmut Meister. (2015) Development of a German reading span test with dual task design for application in cognitive hearing research. International Journal of Audiology 54:2, pages 136-141.
Read now
Marre W. Kaandorp, Cas Smits, Paul Merkus, S. Theo Goverts & Joost M. Festen. (2015) Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology 54:1, pages 48-57.
Read now
Sibylle Pennig, Julia Quehl & Martin Wittkowski. (2014) Speech intelligibility and speech quality of modified loudspeaker announcements examined in a simulated aircraft cabin. Ergonomics 57:12, pages 1806-1816.
Read now
Matthias Hey, Thomas Hocke, Jürgen Hedderich & Joachim Müller-Deile. (2014) Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: Reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients. International Journal of Audiology 53:12, pages 895-902.
Read now
Femke L. Theelen–van den Hoek, Rolph Houben & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2014) Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 53:11, pages 817-828.
Read now
Rolph Houben, Jan Koopman, Heleen Luts, Kirsten C. Wagener, Astrid van Wieringen, Hans Verschuure & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2014) Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise. International Journal of Audiology 53:10, pages 760-763.
Read now
Niklas Rönnberg, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner & Stefan Stenfelt. (2014) Assessing listening effort by measuring short-term memory storage and processing of speech in noise. Speech, Language and Hearing 17:3, pages 123-132.
Read now
Aarno Dietz, Michael Buschermöhle, Antti A. Aarnisalo, Annukka Vanhanen, Taneli Hyyrynen, Olli Aaltonen, Heikki Löppönen, Melanie A. Zokoll & Birger Kollmeier. (2014) The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134:7, pages 728-737.
Read now
Ellen Raben Pedersen & Peter Møller Juhl. (2014) User-operated speech in noise test: Implementation and comparison with a traditional test. International Journal of Audiology 53:5, pages 336-344.
Read now
Gitte Keidser, Harvey Dillon, Jorge Mejia & Cong-Van Nguyen. (2013) An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function. International Journal of Audiology 52:11, pages 795-800.
Read now
Thamar E. M. van Esch, Birger Kollmeier, Matthias Vormann, Johannes Lyzenga, Tammo Houtgast, Mathias Hällgren, Birgitta Larsby, Sheetal P. Athalye, Mark E. Lutman & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2013) Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study. International Journal of Audiology 52:5, pages 305-321.
Read now
Lennart Magnusson, Ann Claesson, Maria Persson & Tomas Tengstrand. (2013) Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: The limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction. International Journal of Audiology 52:1, pages 29-36.
Read now
Melanie A. Zokoll, Kirsten C. Wagener, Thomas Brand, Michael Buschermöhle & Birger Kollmeier. (2012) Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: The German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. International Journal of Audiology 51:9, pages 697-707.
Read now
Sabine Hochmuth, Thomas Brand, Melanie A. Zokoll, Franz Zenker Castro, Nina Wardenga & Birger Kollmeier. (2012) A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. International Journal of Audiology 51:7, pages 536-544.
Read now
Katrin Neumann, Nicola Baumeister, Uwe Baumann, Ulrike Sick, Harald A. Euler & Tobias Weißgerber. (2012) Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children. International Journal of Audiology 51:3, pages 157-163.
Read now
Sofie Jansen, Heleen Luts, Kirsten Carola Wagener, Birger Kollmeier, Matthieu Del Rio, René Dauman, Chris James, Bernard Fraysse, Emilie Vormès, Bruno Frachet, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2012) Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study. International Journal of Audiology 51:3, pages 164-173.
Read now
Susanne Köbler, Ann-Cathrine Lindblad, Åke Olofsson & Björn Hagerman. (2010) Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance. International Journal of Audiology 49:9, pages 613-627.
Read now
Johan Odelius & Örjan Johansson. (2010) Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices. International Journal of Audiology 49:7, pages 508-517.
Read now
Thomas Steffens & Michaela Hacker. (2010) Paediatric Cochlear Implantation Criteria Based on Speech Reception in Noise. Cochlear Implants International 11:sup1, pages 217-220.
Read now
Edward Ozimek, Anna Warzybok & Dariusz Kutzner. (2010) Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. International Journal of Audiology 49:6, pages 444-454.
Read now
Marianne Theunissen, De Wet Swanepoel & Johan Hanekom. (2009) Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests. International Journal of Audiology 48:11, pages 743-757.
Read now
Jens Bo Nielsen & Torsten Dau. (2009) Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test. International Journal of Audiology 48:10, pages 729-741.
Read now
Edward Ozimek, Dariusz Kutzner, Aleksander Sęk & Andrzej Wicher. (2009) Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. International Journal of Audiology 48:7, pages 433-443.
Read now
Birgitta Larsby, Mathias Hällgren & Björn Lyxell. (2008) The interference of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impaired subjects. International Journal of Audiology 47:sup2, pages S83-S90.
Read now
Mathias Hällgren, Birgitta Larsby & Stig Arlinger. (2006) A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. International Journal of Audiology 45:4, pages 227-237.
Read now
Kirsten Carola Wagener, Thomas Brand & Birger Kollmeier. (2006) The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners. International Journal of Audiology 45:1, pages 26-33.
Read now
Mathias Hällgren, Birgitta Larsby, Björn Lyxell & Stig Arlinger. (2005) Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 44:10, pages 574-583.
Read now
Lotte Hagen Hernvig & Steen Østergaard Olsen. (2005) Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold. International Journal of Audiology 44:9, pages 509-512.
Read now
Henrik L. Olsen, Åke Olofsson & Björn Hagerman. (2005) The effect of audibility, signal-to-noise ratio, and temporal speech cues on the benefit from fast-acting compression in modulated noise. International Journal of Audiology 44:7, pages 421-433.
Read now
Véronique Vaillancourt, Chantal Laroche, Chantal Mayer, Cynthia Basque, Madeleine Nali, Alice Eriks-Brophy, Sigfrid D. Soli & Christian Giguère. (2005) Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. International Journal of Audiology 44:6, pages 358-361.
Read now
Henrik L. Olsen, Åke Olofsson & Björn Hagerman. (2004) The effect of presentation level and compression characteristics on sentence recognition in modulated noise. International Journal of Audiology 43:5, pages 283-294.
Read now
Cas Smits, Theo S. Kapteyn & Tammo Houtgast. (2004) Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. International Journal of Audiology 43:1, pages 15-28.
Read now
Thomas Lunner. (2003) Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. International Journal of Audiology 42:sup1, pages 49-58.
Read now
Kirsten Wagener, Jane Lignel Josvassen & Regitze Ardenkjær. (2003) Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido. International Journal of Audiology 42:1, pages 10-17.
Read now
Mathias Hällgren, Magnus Johansson, Birgitta Larsby & Stig Arlinger. (1998) Dichotic Speech Tests. Scandinavian Audiology 27:4, pages 35-39.
Read now
BjÖRn Hagerman. (1997) Attempts to Develop an Efficient Speech Test in Fully Modulated Noise. Scandinavian Audiology 26:2, pages 93-98.
Read now
George C Theodoridis & Zahrl G Schoeny. (1996) Memory Effects to be Considered in the Design of Measurements of the Influence of Context on Speech Perception. Scandinavian Audiology 25:3, pages 193-199.
Read now
Björn Hagerman & Catharina Kinnefors. (1995) Efficient Adaptive Methods for Measuring Speech Reception Threshold in Quiet and in Noise. Scandinavian Audiology 24:1, pages 71-77.
Read now
Kurt Tschopp & HansjÖRg Züst. (1994) Performance of Normally Hearing and Hearing-impaired Listeners Using a German Version of the SPIN Test. Scandinavian Audiology 23:4, pages 241-247.
Read now
Ulla S. Ivarsson & Stig D. Arlinger. (1994) Speech Recognition in Noise Before and After a Work-Day's Noise Exposure. Scandinavian Audiology 23:3, pages 159-163.
Read now
Anders Ovegard & Ann-Brith Ramström. (1994) Individual Follow-Up of Hearing and Fitting. Scandinavian Audiology 23:1, pages 57-63.
Read now
BjÖRn Hagerman. (1993) Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests. British Journal of Audiology 27:6, pages 423-425.
Read now
J. R. Foster, A. Q. Summerfield, D. H. Marshall, L. Palmer, V. Ball & S. Rosen. (1993) Lip-reading the BKB sentence lists: Corrections for list and practice effects. British Journal of Audiology 27:4, pages 233-246.
Read now
Peter Montnemery, Bengt Almqvist & Sten Harris. (1992) Recognition of Telegraphy Signs at Different Listening Levels and Frequencies. Scandinavian Audiology 21:4, pages 255-260.
Read now
Stig Arlinger. (1992) Speech Recognition in Noise When Wearing Amplitude-Sensitive Ear-Muffs. Scandinavian Audiology 21:2, pages 123-126.
Read now
Caroline Tremblay, Michel Picard, Théodor Barbarosie & Roch Banville. (1991) Etude clinique des décalages de seuil vocal dans le bruit. Audiology 30:4, pages 212-240.
Read now
K. Tschopp, T. Beckenbauer & F. P. Harris. (1991) Objective Measures of Sentence Level with Respect to Loudness. Audiology 30:2, pages 113-122.
Read now
Eeva Pekkarinena, Vesa Viljanen, Altti Salmivalli & Jouko Suonpä. (1990) Speech Recognition in a Noisy and Reverberant Environment with and without Earmuffs. Audiology 29:5, pages 286-293.
Read now
Eeva Pekkarinen & Vesa Viljanen. (1990) Effect of Sound-Absorbing Treatment on Speech Discrimination in Rooms. Audiology 29:4, pages 219-227.
Read now
C. Elberling, C. Ludvigsen & P. E. Lyregaard. (1989) Dantale: A New Danish Speech Material. Scandinavian Audiology 18:3, pages 169-175.
Read now
Björn Hagerman, Åke Olofsson & Ann-Cathrine Lindblad. (1987) Relations Between Speech Intelligibility and Psychoacoustical Modulation Transfer Function (PMTF). Scandinavian Audiology 16:3, pages 121-128.
Read now
B. Hagerman. (1984) Clinical Measurements of Speech Reception Threshold in Noise. Scandinavian Audiology 13:1, pages 57-63.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (178)

N.R.A. van Groesen, J.J. Briaire & J.H.M. Frijns. (2023) Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear & Hearing 44:5, pages 1221-1228.
Crossref
Pınar Ertürk, Filiz Aslan & Meral Didem Türkyılmaz. (2023) Listening to speech-in-noise with hearing aids: Do the self-reported outcomes reflect the behavioral speech perception task performance?. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.
Crossref
Kiri MealingsJoaquin T. ValderramaJorge Mejia, Ingrid Yeend, Elizabeth F. Beach & Brent Edwards. (2023) Hearing Aids Reduce Self-Perceived Difficulties in Noise for Listeners With Normal Audiograms. Ear & Hearing.
Crossref
Oliver C. Dziemba, Stephan Merz & Thomas Hocke. (2023) Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-VersorgungEvaluative audiometry after cochlear implant provision. German Version. HNO.
Crossref
Anna-Lena Mönnich, Sebastian Strieth, Andrea Bohnert, Benjamin Philipp Ernst & Tobias Rader. (2023) The German hearing in noise test with a female talker: development and comparison with German male speech test. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 280:7, pages 3157-3169.
Crossref
Tiana M. Cowan, Kasie O. Galley & Carol A. Miller. (2023) Clinical Bilingual Evaluations: Exploring Ways to Overcome Barriers in the Direct Assessment of Both Languages When There Is a Suspicion of Language Disorder. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 8:3, pages 607-617.
Crossref
Hanchen Pei, Yuhong Yang, Xufeng Chen, Qingmu Liu, Hongyang Chen, Weiping Tu & Song Lin. (2023) PMMSD: Development of the Matrix Sentence Intelligibility Dataset for Mandarin with Lombard Effect. PMMSD: Development of the Matrix Sentence Intelligibility Dataset for Mandarin with Lombard Effect.
Lina Homman, Henrik Danielsson & Jerker Rönnberg. (2023) A structural equation mediation model captures the predictions amongst the parameters of the ease of language understanding model. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Melissa A. Papesh, Lora Fowler, Stephanie R. Pesa & Melissa T. Frederick. (2023) Functional Hearing Difficulties in Veterans: Retrospective Chart Review of Auditory Processing Assessments in the VA Health Care System. American Journal of Audiology 32:1, pages 101-118.
Crossref
Jasper Ooster, Laura Tuschen & Bernd T. Meyer. (2023) Self-conducted speech audiometry using automatic speech recognition: Simulation results for listeners with hearing loss. Computer Speech & Language 78, pages 101447.
Crossref
Oliver C. Dziemba, Tobias Oberhoffner & Alexander Müller. (2022) OLSA-Pegelsteuerung bei monauraler Sprachaudiometrie im Störschall zur Evaluation des CI-VersorgungsergebnissesOLSA level control in monaural speech audiometry in background noise for the evaluation of the CI fitting result. HNO 71:2, pages 100-105.
Crossref
Jana Roßbach, Kirsten C. Wagener & Bernd T. Meyer. (2023) Multilingual Non-intrusive Binaural Intelligibility Prediction based on Phone Classification. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Christoph Schmid, Wilhelm Wimmer & Martin Kompis. (2023) BPACE: A Bayesian, Patient-Centered Procedure for Matrix Speech Tests in Noise. Trends in Hearing 27.
Crossref
Marlene Rodríguez-Ferreiro, Montserrat Durán-Bouza & Victoria Marrero-Aguiar. (2022) Design and Development of a Spanish Hearing Test for Speech in Noise (PAHRE). Audiology Research 13:1, pages 32-48.
Crossref
Mustafa Yüksel, İlknur Taşdemir & Ayça Çiprut. (2022) Listening Effort in Prelingual Cochlear Implant Recipients: Effects of Spectral and Temporal Auditory Processing and Contralateral Acoustic Hearing. Otology & Neurotology 43:10, pages e1077-e1084.
Crossref
Victoria Stenbäck, Erik Marsja, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell & Birgitta Larsby. (2022) Informational Masking and Listening Effort in Speech Recognition in Noise: The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Inhibitory Control in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:11, pages 4417-4428.
Crossref
Peter Molander, Gerhard Andersson & Hugo Hesser. (2022) Psychological Acceptance in Adults With Hearing Loss—Psychometric Evaluation and Validation of the Hearing Acceptance Questionnaire. Ear & Hearing 43:6, pages 1752-1760.
Crossref
Fatima M. Denanto, Jeremy Wales, Bo Tideholm & Filip Asp. (2022) Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices. Ear & Hearing 43:6, pages 1708-1720.
Crossref
Maxime Perron, Andrew Dimitrijevic & Claude Alain. (2022) Objective and Subjective Hearing Difficulties Are Associated With Lower Inhibitory Control. Ear & Hearing 43:6, pages 1904-1916.
Crossref
Jerker Rönnberg, Carine Signoret, Josefine Andin & Emil Holmer. (2022) The cognitive hearing science perspective on perceiving, understanding, and remembering language: The ELU model. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Erik Marsja, Victoria Stenbäck, Shahram Moradi, Henrik Danielsson & Jerker Rönnberg. (2022) Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling of the Effect of Cognitive Functioning on Speech Identification. Ear & Hearing 43:5, pages 1437-1446.
Crossref
Tiana Cowan, Caroline Paroby, Lori J. Leibold, Emily Buss, Barbara Rodriguez & Lauren Calandruccio. (2022) Masked-Speech Recognition for Linguistically Diverse Populations: A Focused Review and Suggestions for the Future. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:8, pages 3195-3216.
Crossref
Felix Bröhl, Anne Keitel & Christoph Kayser. (2022) MEG Activity in Visual and Auditory Cortices Represents Acoustic Speech-Related Information during Silent Lip Reading. eneuro 9:3, pages ENEURO.0209-22.2022.
Crossref
Saji MaruthurkkaraSasha CaseRiaan Rottier. (2022) Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear & Hearing 43:2, pages 495-506.
Crossref
Coral E. Dirks, Peggy B. Nelson & Andrew J. Oxenham. (2022) No Benefit of Deriving Cochlear-Implant Maps From Binaural Temporal-Envelope Sensitivity for Speech Perception or Spatial Hearing Under Single-Sided Deafness. Ear & Hearing 43:2, pages 310-322.
Crossref
Dana Bsharat-Maalouf & Hanin Karawani. (2022) Bilinguals’ speech perception in noise: Perceptual and neural associations. PLOS ONE 17:2, pages e0264282.
Crossref
Martin Eklöf, Filip Asp & Erik Berninger. (2022) The Development of Sound Localization Latency in Infants and Young Children with Normal Hearing. Trends in Hearing 26, pages 233121652210883.
Crossref
Pierre Reynard, Josée Lagacé, Charles-Alexandre Joly, Léon Dodelé, Evelyne Veuillet & Hung Thai-Van. (2022) Speech-in-Noise Audiometry in Adults: A Review of the Available Tests for French Speakers. Audiology and Neurotology 27:3, pages 185-199.
Crossref
Mahdie Karbasi, Steffen Zeiler & Dorothea Kolossa. (2022) Microscopic and Blind Prediction of Speech Intelligibility: Theory and Practice. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 30, pages 2141-2155.
Crossref
Jule Pohlhausen, Inga Holube & Joerg Bitzer. (2022) Near-ear sound pressure level distribution in everyday life considering the user’s own voice and privacy. Acta Acustica 6, pages 40.
Crossref
Steven van de Par, Stephan D. Ewert, Lubos Hladek, Christoph Kirsch, Julia Schütze, Josep Llorca-Bofí, Giso Grimm, Maartje M.E. Hendrikse, Birger Kollmeier & Bernhard U. Seeber. (2022) Auditory-visual scenes for hearing research. Acta Acustica 6, pages 55.
Crossref
Nilüfer Bal & Ufuk Derinsu. (2021) The possibility of cochlear synaptopathy in young people using a personal listening device. Auris Nasus Larynx 48:6, pages 1092-1098.
Crossref
Victoria Stenbäck, Erik Marsja, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell & Birgitta Larsby. (2021) The Contribution of Age, Working Memory Capacity, and Inhibitory Control on Speech Recognition in Noise in Young and Older Adult Listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:11, pages 4513-4523.
Crossref
Christos Sidiras, Raul Sanchez-Lopez, Ellen Raben Pedersen, Chris Bang Sørensen, Jacob Nielsen & Jesper Hvass Schmidt. (2021) User-Operated Audiometry Project (UAud) – Introducing an Automated User-Operated System for Audiometric Testing Into Everyday Clinic Practice. Frontiers in Digital Health 3.
Crossref
Giuseppina Emma Puglisi, Anna Warzybok, Arianna Astolfi & Birger Kollmeier. (2021) Effect of reverberation and noise type on speech intelligibility in real complex acoustic scenarios. Building and Environment 204, pages 108137.
Crossref
Sara Akbarzadeh, Sungmin Lee, Fei Chen & Chin-Tuan Tan. (2021) The effect of speech and noise levels on the quality perceived by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners. Speech Communication 132, pages 106-113.
Crossref
Jürgen Kießling. (2021) Die Entwicklung der Audiologie - von Helmholtz bis heute. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 31:3, pages 238-253.
Crossref
Brandi Jett, Emily Buss, Virginia Best, Jacob Oleson & Lauren Calandruccio. (2021) Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:4, pages 1390-1403.
Crossref
Beate Wendt, Jörg Stadler, Jesko L. Verhey, Horst Hessel & Nicole Angenstein. (2021) Effect of Contralateral Noise on Speech Intelligibility. Neuroscience 459, pages 59-69.
Crossref
Nikolai Bernhard, Ulrich Gauger, Eugenia Romo Ventura, Florian C. Uecker, Heidi Olze, Steffen Knopke, Toni Hänsel & Annekatrin Coordes. (2021) Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 6:2, pages 291-301.
Crossref
Zoran Milivojevic, Zoran Velickovic, Dijana Kostic & Marina Milivojevic. (2021) Speech intelligibility in the Serbian language in the presence of ambient noise of the applause. Speech intelligibility in the Serbian language in the presence of ambient noise of the applause.
Daniel Michelsanti, Zheng-Hua Tan, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Yong Xu, Meng Yu, Dong Yu & Jesper Jensen. (2021) An Overview of Deep-Learning-Based Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement and Separation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29, pages 1368-1396.
Crossref
Amin Edraki, Wai-Yip Chan, Jesper Jensen & Daniel Fogerty. (2021) Speech Intelligibility Prediction Using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29, pages 210-225.
Crossref
Lucie Nohová & Julie Čefelínová. (2020) Speech and language assessment in adult cochlear implant candidates and users. Listy klinické logopedie 4:2, pages 16-29.
Crossref
Gerald KiddJr.Jr., Todd R. Jennings & Andrew J. Byrne. (2020) Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148:6, pages 3598-3611.
Crossref
Erin R. O'Neill, Morgan N. Parke, Heather A. Kreft & Andrew J. Oxenham. (2020) Development and Validation of Sentences Without Semantic Context to Complement the Basic English Lexicon Sentences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63:11, pages 3847-3854.
Crossref
Simon Carlile & Gitte Keidser. (2020) Conversational Interaction Is the Brain in Action: Implications for the Evaluation of Hearing and Hearing Interventions. Ear & Hearing 41:Supplement 1, pages 56S-67S.
Crossref
Greg D. Watkins, Brett A. Swanson & Gregg J. Suaning. (2020) Prediction of Individual Cochlear Implant Recipient Speech Perception With the Output Signal to Noise Ratio Metric. Ear & Hearing 41:5, pages 1270-1281.
Crossref
Martin Eklöf, Filip Asp & Erik Berninger. (2020) Sound localization latency in normal hearing and simulated unilateral hearing loss. Hearing Research 395, pages 108011.
Crossref
Young Hoon Jung, Seong Kwang Hong, Hee Seung Wang, Jae Hyun Han, Trung Xuan Pham, Hyunsin Park, Junyeong Kim, Sunghun Kang, Chang D. Yoo & Keon Jae Lee. (2019) Flexible Piezoelectric Acoustic Sensors and Machine Learning for Speech Processing. Advanced Materials 32:35.
Crossref
Daniel Wallace & Jordan Cheer. (2020) Design and evaluation of personal audio systems based on speech privacy constraints. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:4, pages 2271-2282.
Crossref
Kelly M. Miles, Gitte Keidser, Katrina Freeston, Timothy Beechey, Virginia Best & Jörg M. Buchholz. (2020) Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:3, pages 1562-1576.
Crossref
Ohad Hilly, Meirav Sokolov, Reut Beck Finkel, Ofir Zavdy, Rafael Shemesh & Joseph Attias. (2020) Hearing in Noise With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Adults With Pseudo-conductive Hearing Loss. Otology & Neurotology 41:3, pages 379-385.
Crossref
Filip AspSabine Reinfeldt. (2020) Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech. Ear & Hearing 41:2, pages 411-419.
Crossref
Elin Roverud, Ann R. Bradlow & Gerald KiddJr.Jr.. (2020) Examining the sentence superiority effect for sentences presented and reported in forwards or backwards order. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:2, pages 381-400.
Crossref
Marc R. Schädler, David Hülsmeier, Anna Warzybok & Birger Kollmeier. (2020) Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners With Impaired Hearing Employing FADE. Trends in Hearing 24, pages 233121652093892.
Crossref
Marlin Johansson, Filip Asp & Erik Berninger. (2020) Children With Congenital Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Effects of Late Hearing Aid Amplification—A Pilot Study. Ear & Hearing 41:1, pages 55-66.
Crossref
Jens Nirme, Birgitta Sahlén, Viveka Lyberg Åhlander, Jonas Brännström & Magnus Haake. (2020) Audio-visual speech comprehension in noise with real and virtual speakers. Speech Communication 116, pages 44-55.
Crossref
L. Hörmann, P. Ambrosch & M. Hey. (2019) Charakterisierung eines geschlossenen LogatomtestsCharacterization of a closed-set logatome test. HNO 68:1, pages 25-31.
Crossref
Ella Braat-Eggen, Marijke Keus v.d. Poll, Maarten Hornikx & Armin Kohlrausch. (2019) Auditory distraction in open-plan study environments: Effects of background speech and reverberation time on a collaboration task. Applied Acoustics 154, pages 148-160.
Crossref
Luuk P. H. van de Rijt, Anja Roye, Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, A. John van Opstal & Marc M. van Wanrooij. (2019) The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13.
Crossref
Kathryn M. Yates, David R. Moore, Sygal Amitay & Johanna G. Barry. (2019) Sensitivity to Melody, Rhythm, and Beat in Supporting Speech-in-Noise Perception in Young Adults. Ear & Hearing 40:2, pages 358-367.
Crossref
Lars Bramsløw, Marianna Vatti, Rikke Rossing, Gaurav Naithani & Niels Henrik Pontoppidan. (2019) A Competing Voices Test for Hearing-Impaired Listeners Applied to Spatial Separation and Ideal Time-Frequency Masks. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121651984828.
Crossref
Adam Weisser & Jörg M. Buchholz. (2019) Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145:1, pages 349-360.
Crossref
Larry E. Humes, Kimberly G. Skinner, Dana L. Kinney, Sara E. Rogers, Anna K. Main & Tera M. Quigley. (2019) Clinical Effectiveness of an At-Home Auditory Training Program. Ear and Hearing 40:5, pages 1043-1060.
Crossref
Dorothea Wendt, Thomas Koelewijn, Patrycja Książek, Sophia E. Kramer & Thomas Lunner. (2018) Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test. Hearing Research 369, pages 67-78.
Crossref
Greg D. Watkins, Brett A. SwansonGregg J. Suaning. (2018) An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility. Ear & Hearing 39:5, pages 958-968.
Crossref
Christian Bech Christensen, James Michael Harte, Thomas Lunner & Preben Kidmose. (2018) Ear-EEG-Based Objective Hearing Threshold Estimation Evaluated on Normal Hearing Subjects. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 65:5, pages 1026-1034.
Crossref
Jasper Ooster, Rainer Huber, Birger Kollmeier & Bernd T. Meyer. (2018) Evaluation of an automated speech-controlled listening test with spontaneous and read responses. Speech Communication 98, pages 85-94.
Crossref
Adriana A. Zekveld, Marieke Pronk, Henrik Danielsson & Jerker Rönnberg. (2018) Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61:3, pages 762-775.
Crossref
Christian Bech Christensen, Renskje K. Hietkamp, James M. Harte, Thomas Lunner & Preben Kidmose. (2018) Toward EEG-Assisted Hearing Aids: Objective Threshold Estimation Based on Ear-EEG in Subjects With Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651881620.
Crossref
Yingjiu Nie, John J. GalvinIIIIII, Michael Morikawa, Victoria André, Harley Wheeler & Qian-Jie Fu. (2018) Music and Speech Perception in Children Using Sung Speech. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651876681.
Crossref
Steven Van Kuyk, W. Bastiaan Kleijn & Richard C. Hendriks. (2018) An Instrumental Intelligibility Metric Based on Information Theory. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 25:1, pages 115-119.
Crossref
Filip Asp, Anne-Marie Jakobsson & Erik Berninger. (2018) The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech. Hearing Research 357, pages 54-63.
Crossref
Laura A. D’Aquila, Joseph G. Desloge, Charlotte M. Reed & Louis D. Braida. (2017) Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment. Trends in Hearing 21, pages 233121651771035.
Crossref
Johannes Zaar, Nicola Schmitt, Ralph-Peter Derleth, Mishaela DiNino, Julie G. Arenberg & Torsten Dau. (2017) Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:5, pages 3216-3226.
Crossref
Melanie A. Zokoll, Kirsten C. Wagener & Birger Kollmeier. (2017) Diagnosing and Screening in a Minority Language: A Validation Study. American Journal of Audiology 26:3S, pages 369-372.
Crossref
Jedrzej Kocinski & Edward Ozimek. (2017) Logatome and Sentence Recognition Related to Acoustic Parameters of Enclosures. Archives of Acoustics 42:3, pages 385-394.
Crossref
Duo-Duo Tao, Qian-Jie Fu, John J. GalvinIIIIII & Ya-Feng Yu. (2017) The development and validation of the Closed-set Mandarin Sentence (CMS) test. Speech Communication 92, pages 125-131.
Crossref
U. Hoppe & A. Hast. (2016) Sprachaudiometrie bei der Indikation von Hörhilfen und HörimplantatenSpeech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids. HNO 65:3, pages 195-202.
Crossref
T. Brand & K. C. Wagener. (2016) Eigenschaften, Leistungen und Grenzen von MatrixtestsCharacteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests. HNO 65:3, pages 182-188.
Crossref
Johannes Zaar & Torsten Dau. (2017) Predicting consonant recognition and confusions in normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141:2, pages 1051-1064.
Crossref
Ellen Raben Pedersen & Peter Møller Juhl. (2017) Simulated Critical Differences for Speech Reception Thresholds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60:1, pages 238-250.
Crossref
Jesper Jensen & Cees H. Taal. (2016) An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24:11, pages 2009-2022.
Crossref
Mehrnaz ZeitooniElina Mäki-TorkkoStefan Stenfelt. (2016) Binaural Hearing Ability With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Subjects With Normal Hearing: Implications for Bone Conduction Hearing Aids. Ear & Hearing 37:6, pages 690-702.
Crossref
Cristina Rigato, Sabine Reinfeldt, Bo Håkansson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Myrthe K. S. Hol & Måns Eeg-Olofsson. (2016) Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users. Otology & Neurotology 37:9, pages 1381-1387.
Crossref
Colleen G. Le Prell & Douglas S. Brungart. (2016) Speech-in-Noise Tests and Supra-threshold Auditory Evoked Potentials as Metrics for Noise Damage and Clinical Trial Outcome Measures. Otology & Neurotology 37:8, pages e295-e302.
Crossref
Christian Füllgrabe & Stuart Rosen. (2016) On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds. Frontiers in Psychology 07.
Crossref
M. Hey, G. Brademann & P. Ambrosch. (2016) Der Freiburger Einsilbertest in der postoperativen CI-DiagnostikThe Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics. HNO 64:8, pages 601-607.
Crossref
Gerald KiddJr.Jr., Christine R. Mason, Jayaganesh Swaminathan, Elin Roverud, Kameron K. Clayton & Virginia Best. (2016) Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140:1, pages 132-144.
Crossref
Mary Rudner. (2016) Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort. Ear & Hearing 37:1, pages 69S-76S.
Crossref
Jędrzej Kociński & Edward Ozimek. (2016) Speech Recognition in an Enclosure with a Long Reverberation Time. Archives of Acoustics 41:2, pages 255-264.
Crossref
M. Yu. Boboshko, E. V. Zhilinskaia, A. Warzybok, N. V. Maltseva, M. Zokoll & B. Kollmeier. (2016) The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test. Vestnik otorinolaringologii 81:5, pages 40.
Crossref
Anne Schlueter, Ulrike Lemke, Birger Kollmeier & Inga Holube. (2016) Normal and Time-Compressed Speech. Trends in Hearing 20, pages 233121651666988.
Crossref
Alexandra Winkler, Matthias Latzel & Inga Holube. (2016) Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches. Trends in Hearing 20, pages 233121651663174.
Crossref
Rolph Houben & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2015) Optimization of the Dutch Matrix Test by Random Selection of Sentences From a Preselected Subset. Trends in Hearing 19, pages 233121651558313.
Crossref
Teresa Cervera & Vicente Rosell. (2014) The Effects of Linguistic Context on Word Recognition in Noise by Elderly Listeners Using Spanish Sentence Lists (SSL). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44:6, pages 819-829.
Crossref
Johannes Zaar & Torsten Dau. (2015) Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138:3, pages 1253-1267.
Crossref
Marijke Keus van de Poll, Johannes Carlsson, John E. Marsh, Robert Ljung, Johan Odelius, Sabine J. Schlittmeier, Gunilla Sundin & Patrik Sörqvist. (2015) Unmasking the effects of masking on performance: The potential of multiple-voice masking in the office environment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138:2, pages 807-816.
Crossref
Victoria Stenbäck, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell & Birgitta Larsby. (2015) The Swedish Hayling task, and its relation to working memory, verbal ability, and speech-recognition-in-noise. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56:3, pages 264-272.
Crossref
John E. Marsh, Robert Ljung, Anatole Nöstl, Emma Threadgold & Tom A. Campbell. (2015) Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref

Displaying 200 of 277 citing articles. Use the download link below to view the full list of citing articles.

Download full citations list

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.